also gave a banquet
The act of giving a banquet signifies a celebration or a gathering of importance. In the Persian culture, banquets were not only social events but also displays of wealth and power. Vashti's banquet for the women suggests a parallel to King Xerxes' feast, indicating her own status and the respect she commanded. This phrase underscores the cultural norms of hospitality and the role of women in the royal court, providing a backdrop for the unfolding drama.

for the women
This phrase highlights the separation of genders in social settings during the time. The women’s banquet, led by Vashti, suggests a space where women could exercise a degree of autonomy and fellowship. It reflects the societal norms of the Persian Empire, where women of the court had their own spheres of influence. This separation also sets the stage for the pivotal moment when Vashti refuses the king's command, emphasizing her independence and the potential for female solidarity.

in the royal palace
The royal palace serves as a symbol of power, authority, and the central hub of the Persian Empire. It is within this setting that the events of the Book of Esther unfold, highlighting the intersection of personal decisions and their impact on national affairs. The palace's opulence and grandeur contrast with the personal struggles and moral decisions faced by its inhabitants, reminding readers of the transient nature of earthly power compared to divine providence.

of King Xerxes
King Xerxes, known historically as Xerxes I, ruled the Persian Empire from 486 to 465 BC. His reign is marked by ambitious military campaigns and vast construction projects. In the biblical narrative, Xerxes' character is portrayed as powerful yet capricious, setting the stage for the dramatic events that follow. His decisions, influenced by advisors and personal whims, reflect the complexities of leadership and the susceptibility of human rulers to pride and folly. This context invites readers to consider the sovereignty of God over earthly kings and empires.

The women.--There should be no article.

CHAPTER 1:10-22 THE DISGRACE OF VASHTI (Esther 1:10-22). On the seventh day of the feast "to all in Shushan" (ver. 5), the king having excited himself with drink, took it into his head to send a message to Vashti, requiring her to make her appearance in the banquet of the men, since he desired to exhibit her beauty to the assembled guests, as "she was fair to look on" (ver. 11). His design must have been to present her unveiled to the coarse admiration of a multitude of semi-drunken revellers, in order that they might envy him the possession of so lovely a wife. Such a proceeding was a gross breach of Persian etiquette, and a cruel outrage upon one whom he above all men was bound to protect. Vashti, therefore, declined to obey (ver. 12). Preferring the risk of death to dishonour, she braved the anger of her despotic lord, and sent him back a message by his chamberlains that she would not come. We can well understand that to an absolute monarch such a rebuff, in the face of his whole court and of some hundreds or thousands of assembled guests, must have been exasperating in the extreme. At the moment when he had thought to glorify himself by a notable display of his omnipotence, he was foiled, defeated, made a laughing-stock to all Susa. "Therefore was the king very wroth, and his anger burned in him." It is to his credit that, being thus fiercely enraged, he did not proceed to violence, but so far restrained himself as to refer the matter to the judgment of others, and ask the "seven princes" the question, "What is to be done according to law unto queen Vashti, for not performing the commandment of the king?" (ver. 15). The advice of the princes, uttered by one of their body (vers. 16-20), and assented to by the remainder (ver. 21), was, that Yashti should be degraded from the position of queen, and her place given to another. This sentence was supported by specious arguments based upon expediency, and ignoring entirely the outrageous character of the king's command, which was of course the real, and sole, justification of Vashti's disobedience. It was treated as a simple question of the wife's duty to obey her husband, and the husband's right to enforce submission. Ahasuerus, as might be expected, received the decision of his obsequious counsellors with great satisfaction, and forthwith sent letters into all the provinces of his vast empire, announcing what had been done, and requiring wives everywhere to submit themselves unreservedly to the absolute rule of their lord (ver. 22).

Parallel Commentaries ...