That very night
This phrase underscores the immediacy and suddenness of God's judgment. In the context of the narrative, it highlights the swift fulfillment of the prophecy given through the mysterious writing on the wall. The Hebrew word for "night" (לַיְלָה, laylah) often symbolizes a time of judgment or divine intervention in the Bible. This serves as a reminder of the unpredictability of life and the importance of being spiritually prepared at all times, as God's timing is perfect and His plans are executed with precision.

Belshazzar
Belshazzar, the central figure in this verse, was the co-regent of Babylon, ruling alongside his father Nabonidus. Historically, Belshazzar's existence was confirmed through archaeological discoveries, such as the Nabonidus Cylinder, which mentions him. His name means "Bel, protect the king," reflecting the Babylonian practice of invoking their gods for protection. However, despite his name and royal status, Belshazzar's reliance on false gods and his arrogance led to his downfall, illustrating the biblical principle that pride precedes destruction (Proverbs 16:18).

king of the Chaldeans
The term "Chaldeans" refers to the people of Babylon, a dominant empire known for its wealth, power, and idolatry. The Chaldeans were renowned for their advancements in astronomy and mathematics, yet their spiritual blindness and moral decay are evident in the narrative. The title "king of the Chaldeans" emphasizes Belshazzar's authority and responsibility over a great empire, yet it also serves as a stark reminder that earthly power is fleeting and subject to the sovereignty of God.

was slain
The phrase "was slain" indicates the finality of Belshazzar's fate. The Hebrew root for "slain" (קָטַל, qatal) conveys the act of killing or putting to death. This abrupt end to Belshazzar's life serves as a sobering testament to the consequences of defying the living God. It echoes the biblical theme that divine justice will ultimately prevail, and those who oppose God will face His righteous judgment. This event also marks the transition of power from the Babylonian Empire to the Medo-Persian Empire, fulfilling God's prophetic word and demonstrating His control over the rise and fall of nations.

Verse 30. - In that night was Belshazzar the King of the Chaldeans slain. The version of the LXX. is here very different, "And the interpretation came upon Belshazzar the king, and the kingdom was taken from the Chaldeans, and given to the Medes and the Persians. There seems no possibility of connecting these two readings so that either should be shown to have come from the other. The Massoretic text, which is here supported by Theodotion and the Peshitta, is the shorter; but in this instance, as neither can have sprung from the other, Brevity has less probative force. If we look at the probability of the situation, we are compelled to accept the Septuagint reading. If the Massoretic reading had been the original, the dramatic completeness of the disaster, following with such rapidity on the back of the prophecy, would certainly have been preserved in every translation. Whereas the desire for this dramatic completeness might lead to the Massoretic verse being fabricated. Further, when we look at the events of the night, it seems impossible to place all of them in the short interval of one night. The feast had begun after sundown, for the lamps were lighted. It had already gone on some time ere Belshazzar thought of the vessels of the house of God. Then, in contempt of Jehovah, the guests sang praises to the gods of Babylon. it is after all this that the writing appears. There is next the calling of the wise men, who were in the vicinity of the palace. On their failure to explain the writing, the other wise men are summoned by proclamation; they assemble, essay the reading, and fail. The queen-mother comps - either is called, or, hearing the tumult, comes in herself - and tells Belshazzar of Daniel. Daniel is summoned, and reads the writing. Even if we maintain - although it does not seem the natural reading of the passage - that the proclamation of a reward to him who could read the writing followed immediately on the order to call in the astrologers and other wise men, still, it is difficult to imagine all the events, especially the summoning of all the wise men in Babylon by proclamation, and the finding out of Daniel and bringing him to the court, taking place in one night, and that in that very night was Belshazzar slain. On the other hand, the Septuagint makes no such demand on our belief. According to it, the prophecy was not so closely connected with its fulfilment. The feast recorded here may have taken place six, eight, or ten )ears before the actual fall of Babylon. We know that from his seventh year till some time between his eleventh and seventeenth year Nahunahid was in Tema. This feast might be the inauguration of Belshazzar's viceroyalty; in that case it would be nearly ten years before the capture of Babylon by Cyrus. If that is so, the supposed contradiction between this verse and Daniel 8:1 vanishes. We need only look at the various theories of who Belshazzar was. Niebuhr assumes it as a second name for Evil-Merodach - a view for which Keil has some sympathy. Niebuhr ingeniously combines the statement from Berosus, that his reign was ἀνόμως καὶ ἀσελγῶς. This, however, might mean a favour for the Jews, shown by the special honour given to Jehoiachin - a thing which would be readily regarded by the Babylonians as "lawless and outrageous." lie maintains that the change of dynasty implied in Babylon was the assumption of the supremacy by Astyages the Mede, who, according to Niebuhr, is Darius the Mede. After one year's personal reign, he placed Neriglissar on the throne. This view is definitely contradicted by the contract tables, which have no reference to a reign between Evil-Merodach and Neriglissar. The other theory is that he is Labasi-Marduk. This view is maintained by Delitzsch and Ebrard. All of them assume the murder of the king the very night of the feast - a thing which is in the teeth of probability, and not supported by the Septuagint reading.

Parallel Commentaries ...


That very night
בְּלֵ֣ילְיָ֔א (bə·lê·lə·yā)
Preposition-b | Noun - masculine singular determinate
Strong's 3916: Night

Belshazzar
בֵּלְאשַׁצַּ֖ר (bê·lə·šaṣ·ṣar)
Noun - proper - masculine singular
Strong's 1113: Belshazzar -- a Babylonian king

king
מַלְכָּ֥א (mal·kā)
Noun - masculine singular determinate
Strong's 4430: A king

of the Chaldeans
כַשְׂדָּאָֽה׃ (ḵaś·dā·’āh)
Noun - proper - masculine plural
Strong's 3779: Chaldeans -- a Chaldaean

was slain,
קְטִ֕יל (qə·ṭîl)
Verb - Nifal - Perfect - third person masculine singular
Strong's 6992: To kill


Daniel 5:30 NIV
Daniel 5:30 NLT
Daniel 5:30 ESV
Daniel 5:30 NASB
Daniel 5:30 KJV

Daniel 5:30 BibleApps.com
Daniel 5:30 Biblia Paralela
Daniel 5:30 Chinese Bible
Daniel 5:30 French Bible
Daniel 5:30 Catholic Bible

OT Prophets: Daniel 5:30 In that night Belshazzar the Chaldean King (Dan. Da Dn)