Who is Angel Ariel? Overview of the Name “Ariel” The name “Ariel” appears in the Hebrew Scriptures in a few places. Most commonly, it is associated with Jerusalem, as in Isaiah 29, and can be translated “Lion of God” (derived from the Hebrew roots ארי, meaning “lion,” and אל, meaning “God”). However, Scripture does not identify an angel named Ariel. The primary biblical usage pertains to the city of Jerusalem or certain individuals, rather than any heavenly being. Below is a comprehensive examination of the references to “Ariel” in the canonical Scriptures, an exploration of extrabiblical mentions of “Angel Ariel,” and a discussion of relevant historical and theological considerations. 1. Biblical Usages of “Ariel” 1. Isaiah’s Reference to “Ariel” (Isaiah 29:1–2) • Isaiah speaks prophetically concerning Jerusalem by calling it “Ariel.” In Isaiah 29:1 we read, “Woe to you, O Ariel, the city where David camped! Add year to year; let the feasts recur.” • The term here conveys Jerusalem’s central place in Israel’s worship, as it was the site of the Temple where sacrifices (often associated with altar fires—some link the word “Ariel” to an “altar hearth” motif) were offered. • The prophet’s usage underscores coming judgment, yet also the city’s status as beloved by God. He uses the name poetically, prompting reflection on the city’s role as both “Lion of God” and place of sacrificial worship. 2. 2 Samuel 23:20 (Possible Reference) • Some English translations include the phrase “the two sons of Ariel of Moab,” though many modern scholarly translations do not use “Ariel” here. Instead, certain manuscripts or interpretive choices differ. Even where “Ariel” does appear, it speaks of a Moabite figure, not an angel or heavenly being. 3. No Canonical Evidence for an Angel Ariel • In all recognized canonical Scriptures, including the entirety of the Old and New Testaments, there is no reference to an angel named Ariel. • Traditional lists of named angels in the Bible (e.g., Michael in Jude 1:9, Gabriel in Luke 1:19, and a few references to the Angel of the LORD) do not include Ariel. 2. Meaning and Significance of the Name 1. Etymological Roots • “Ariel” (אֲרִיאֵל) is often understood to mean “Lion of God.” Some commentators also connect it with “altar hearth,” based on a slight variation in Hebrew spelling for “hearth” and “lion,” though “Lion of God” is the more common interpretation. 2. The Lion Motif • Lions in Scripture sometimes symbolize majesty, strength, or God’s power (e.g., Amos 3:8; Hosea 11:10). • By extension, the name “Ariel” can evoke a sense of divine strength or protection. Jerusalem is poetically referred to as “Ariel” to highlight its role as a seat of divine presence and might. 3. Distinction from Angelic References • Though “Ariel” carries connotations of strength and divine association, the biblical text itself never bestows the title “Angel Ariel” upon any heavenly messenger. • Attempting to elevate the name in Scripture to refer to a specific angel surpasses the bounds of what is explicitly taught. 3. Extrabiblical Mentions of “Angel Ariel” 1. Jewish Mystical or Esoteric Texts • Some late or mystical Jewish traditions, found in certain apocryphal or esoteric writings, may mention Ariel as an angelic being. These texts are outside the recognized Hebrew Bible and hold no canonical authority. • Because these documents originate in varied historical periods and theological contexts, their claims do not carry the same weight as Scripture. 2. Medieval and Renaissance Writings • In some medieval Christian and mystical literature, “Ariel” emerges as an angelic figure tied to nature or certain elements (e.g., wind, water), but these ideas reflect syncretistic or allegorical traditions rather than biblically derived doctrine. • Researchers examining these writings have concluded that they do not accurately represent the theology of the Hebrew prophets or the Apostles. 3. Difference in Authority • Conservative Christian teaching affirms that Scripture alone (2 Timothy 3:16) bears ultimate authority: “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness”. • Any references to “Angel Ariel” outside of the Bible must be tested against this principal authority. 4. Historical and Archaeological Considerations 1. Jerusalem as “Ariel” • Archaeological studies in Jerusalem confirm the city’s ancient significance—remains from the time of David, Solomon, and later periods attest to the city’s longstanding centrality. • The biblical usage of “Ariel” for Jerusalem may be further illuminated by archaeological finds showcasing Jerusalem’s stature and religious importance, but none of these findings suggest the existence of an angel named Ariel. 2. No Epigraphic Evidence for Angel Ariel • Inscriptions, papyri, and other manuscript discoveries that relate to the biblical era have not uncovered references to an “Angel Ariel” recognized by Israelites or the early Christian community. • This absence reinforces that the name “Ariel,” in the biblical sense, is primarily applied to either Jerusalem or certain men—never to an angel. 5. Doctrinal and Theological Implications 1. Authority of Scripture Regarding Angels • The Bible gives careful details for some angels (e.g., Gabriel, Michael) and preserves mystery for others. If an angelic being is not mentioned in Scripture, it indicates that God did not see fit to reveal it for doctrinal or salvific instruction. • Encouraging speculation about an otherwise unnamed or nonexistent angelic figure can distract believers from focusing on Christ’s revealed work of redemption (1 Peter 1:10–12). 2. Guarding Against Additions to Scripture • Deuteronomy 4:2 warns, “You shall not add to the word that I am commanding you or subtract from it…” Similar cautions echo in Revelation 22:18–19. • As Scripture is consistent, any introduction of an unknown heavenly being named “Ariel” into biblical teaching stands outside authoritative revelation. 3. Focus on Named Angels in Redemptive History • The biblical storyline highlights angels who ministered at key redemptive events—e.g., the angelic announcement to Mary (Luke 1:26–35) and the angels at the Resurrection (Luke 24:4–7). • The emphasis remains on God’s unfolding salvation rather than on speculative angelology. Such caution preserves the clarity that salvation is accomplished by Christ through His resurrection (Romans 10:9; 1 Corinthians 15:3–6). 6. Conclusion No canonical text identifies an “Angel Ariel,” and the references to “Ariel” in Scripture relate primarily to Jerusalem or, in some cases, certain individuals. While extrabiblical writings have attempted to introduce “Ariel” as an angelic figure, these sources are not recognized as authoritative within the biblical canon. Consequently, from the standpoint of Scripture, there is no evidence supporting the existence of an angel specifically given the name Ariel. The Bible’s central message remains focused on God’s redemptive plan through Jesus Christ. Angels named or unnamed serve as messengers to facilitate that plan, but none are called “Ariel” in the inspired text. Thus, any teaching or tradition about a heavenly being by that name extends beyond the scope of the biblical witness and should be examined carefully in light of the clear authority of God’s Word. |
    |