Is resurrection spiritual or physical?
Is the resurrection spiritual or physical?

Overview and Key Question

The resurrection of Jesus has been a central topic of discussion across centuries. The core issue revolves around whether this resurrection should be understood as purely spiritual or as a physical, bodily event. Scripture repeatedly testifies to the tangible nature of Jesus rising from the dead, yet there are passages some interpret in a spiritual sense. This entry aims to clarify the nature of the resurrection using evidence from the Bible (Berean Standard Bible), historical accounts, and contextual analysis.


Biblical Terminology and Context

In the language of the New Testament, the word for “resurrection” (Greek: anastasis) often implies a physical rising of a body (cf. Matthew 22:31; 1 Corinthians 15:21). The Gospels and Epistles articulate that Jesus was bodily raised: the same body laid in the tomb emerged alive, though transformed. Each of the four Gospels ends with a narrative or reference to the tomb being empty (e.g., Luke 24:1–3), indicating that the physical body of Jesus no longer remained in the grave.

The concept of “spiritual” in Scripture does not typically negate the physical. Instead, it often refers to being led by the Holy Spirit and having a life oriented toward God (Romans 8:9–11). Therefore, the distinction between “spiritual” and “physical” in biblical terms does not necessarily imply that the spiritual is non-physical. The accounts of Jesus’s post-resurrection appearances provide compelling evidence of a bodily dimension.


Physical Evidence in the Gospel Accounts

1. The Empty Tomb

All four Gospels attest that the tomb where Jesus’s body was placed was found empty (Matthew 28:5–7; Mark 16:4–6; Luke 24:2–3; John 20:1–2). Had the resurrection been only spiritual, there would have been no reason for the tomb to be left empty or for the body to vanish.

2. Touch and Interaction

Jesus explicitly showed His hands and feet to His disciples, invited them to touch Him, and even ate in their presence:

“Look at My hands and My feet. It is I Myself. Touch Me and see—for a spirit does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have” (Luke 24:39).

This statement affirms a physical dimension, as Jesus distinguishes His resurrected body from a mere disembodied spirit.

3. Thomas’s Confession

The account of Doubting Thomas further emphasizes the physical aspect of the resurrection:

“Then He said to Thomas, ‘Put your finger here and look at My hands. Reach out your hand and put it into My side. Stop doubting and believe’” (John 20:27).

Thomas’s response—“My Lord and my God!” (John 20:28)—underscores that he understood Jesus had truly been raised in a bodily form.


Pauline Explanation of the Resurrection Body

1 Corinthians 15 is the most extensive biblical treatment on resurrection. Paul writes, “So also is the resurrection of the dead: It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption. … It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body” (1 Corinthians 15:42, 44). Here, “spiritual body” does not equate to immaterial; the context clarifies it as a physical body empowered by and perfectly aligned with God’s Spirit.

Later, Paul states, “If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is worthless, and so is your faith” (1 Corinthians 15:14). This underscores that the entire Christian message hinges on a real, bodily resurrection. A mere spiritual notion would not fulfill the prophecies concerning the Messiah’s victory over death, nor would it have produced such a dramatic transformation in the early believers.


Historical and Manuscript Support

Early Christian writings—some predating portions of the New Testament canon—consistently affirm the physical resurrection. Manuscript evidence, including early papyri and codices, shows no substantial variation in the core resurrection narratives. Archaeological studies of first-century Judea reveal that tomb design and burial practices align with the Gospel details, lending credibility to the accounts of Jesus’s burial and subsequent discovery of the empty tomb.

Extra-biblical sources, such as the historian Tacitus (Annals 15.44) and the Jewish historian Josephus (Antiquities 18.3.3), refer to Jesus’s crucifixion under Pontius Pilate and the rise of the Christian movement shortly afterward. While these sources do not confirm the resurrection event itself, they corroborate key historical details: Jesus’s death and the ensuing belief among His followers that He physically rose from the dead.


Philosophical and Theological Implications

A purely spiritual resurrection would fail to account for the physical, mortal aspect of humanity that the Bible affirms God redeems. Scripture teaches that humans possess both material and immaterial dimensions (Genesis 2:7). A bodily resurrection illustrates God’s victory over tangible death, offering hope of future resurrection for believers (1 Corinthians 15:21–22) and displaying that redemption extends to the physical realm.

Furthermore, the bodily nature of Christ’s resurrection emphasizes the union of the divine and human. It satisfies the prophecy that the Messiah would conquer death (Isaiah 25:8, quoted in 1 Corinthians 15:54) and give believers a model of what is to come—a transformation of our mortal bodies to immortality (Philippians 3:20–21).


Conclusion

Every major strand of Scriptural testimony supports that Jesus’s resurrection is physical and bodily, though glorified and no longer subject to decay. The empty tomb, the interactions with His disciples, and the explicit teachings of the Apostles all affirm a tangible, bodily raised Christ. Within the broader context of Scripture and historical evidence, the resurrection is best understood as a physical event. This reality anchors Christian faith in the concrete triumph over death and guarantees the hope that believers, too, will share in that bodily resurrection.

Why did Mary become engaged to Joseph?
Top of Page
Top of Page