Later on, at the time of the wheat harvest
The wheat harvest typically occurred in late spring or early summer in ancient Israel, around May or June. This timing is significant as it was a period of celebration and abundance, often associated with the Feast of Weeks (Shavuot), a time of thanksgiving for the harvest. The mention of the wheat harvest sets the stage for the events that follow, indicating a time of agricultural prosperity and community activity. This context highlights the contrast between the expected joy of the season and the personal conflict Samson faces.

Samson took a young goat
Bringing a young goat was a customary gift, symbolizing peace and goodwill. It was common in ancient Near Eastern cultures to present such gifts when visiting family or seeking reconciliation. This gesture by Samson suggests his intention to make amends or to reaffirm his relationship with his wife, despite previous conflicts. The young goat as a gift also reflects the agrarian lifestyle and the importance of livestock in the economy and social customs of the time.

and went to visit his wife
Samson's visit to his wife indicates his desire to resume marital relations, which had been disrupted. In the context of Judges 14, Samson's wife had been given to another man by her father, which Samson was unaware of. This visit is an attempt to restore his marriage, highlighting the personal and familial tensions that are central to the narrative. The act of visiting one's wife also underscores the patriarchal structure of ancient Israelite society, where the husband had the right to claim his wife.

“I want to go to my wife in her room,” he said
Samson's request to go to his wife's room signifies his intention to reestablish intimacy and conjugal rights. The phrase reflects the private nature of marital relationships and the expectation of privacy within the household. This request also underscores the personal nature of Samson's mission, driven by his emotional and physical desires. The mention of "her room" indicates the domestic setting and the cultural norms surrounding marriage and family life in ancient Israel.

But her father would not let him enter
The refusal by the father-in-law to let Samson enter reveals the underlying conflict and betrayal. In Judges 14, Samson's wife was given to another man, which was a significant breach of trust and social custom. This act of barring Samson highlights the tension between personal relationships and familial obligations. It also sets the stage for the ensuing conflict and Samson's subsequent actions. The father's decision reflects the complex dynamics of honor, shame, and familial authority in the ancient Near Eastern context.

“I was sure that you thoroughly hated her,” said her father,
The father’s assumption reflects the cultural norms of the time, where marriages were often arranged and based on alliances rather than love. The father's decision is based on his interpretation of Samson's actions, which he perceives as rejection. This reflects the patriarchal society where fathers had significant control over their daughters' marriages. The phrase also highlights the misunderstanding and lack of communication between Samson and his father-in-law, which is a recurring theme in Samson's narrative.

“so I gave her to one of the men who accompanied you.”
This action underscores the lack of agency women had in ancient times, as the daughter is given to another man without her consent. It also reflects the customs of the time, where a woman’s marital status could be changed by her father’s decision. The men who accompanied Samson were likely Philistines, indicating the complex relationships between the Israelites and Philistines during this period. This act of giving Samson's wife to another man sets the stage for further conflict between Samson and the Philistines.

“Is not her younger sister more beautiful than she?”
The father attempts to placate Samson by offering another daughter, which reflects the practice of polygamy and the view of women as commodities. The mention of beauty as a bargaining tool highlights the superficial values placed on women in that era. This also echoes the biblical theme of sibling rivalry and preference, seen in stories like Leah and Rachel (Genesis 29), where beauty and favor play significant roles in marital arrangements.

“Please take her instead.”
The father's plea indicates desperation and a desire to maintain peace with Samson, who is known for his strength and volatile nature. This offer can be seen as an attempt to rectify the situation and avoid Samson's wrath. It also reflects the cultural practice of substitution in marriage arrangements, where a younger sibling could replace an elder in certain circumstances. This plea foreshadows the continued tension and conflict in Samson's life, as his personal relationships often lead to broader national consequences.

Samson said to them
Samson, a judge of Israel, is speaking to the Philistines. His role as a judge was to deliver Israel from its oppressors, and his life is marked by personal vendettas against the Philistines. This phrase indicates a direct confrontation, highlighting the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Philistines during this period. Samson's actions are often seen as both personal and divinely ordained, reflecting the complex nature of his judgeship.

This time I will be blameless
Samson refers to a previous incident where he felt wronged by the Philistines, specifically regarding his wife being given to another man. By stating he will be blameless, Samson implies that his forthcoming actions are justified. This reflects the ancient Near Eastern concept of honor and retribution, where personal and familial honor was paramount. The idea of being "blameless" suggests a moral or ethical justification for his actions, which is significant in understanding the cyclical nature of sin and retribution in the Book of Judges.

in doing harm to the Philistines
The Philistines were a significant threat to Israel during the time of the Judges, often oppressing them. Samson's actions against them are part of a larger narrative of deliverance, where God uses flawed individuals to achieve His purposes. The harm Samson intends to inflict is both personal revenge and part of his divine mission to begin the deliverance of Israel from Philistine domination. This reflects the broader biblical theme of God using imperfect people to fulfill His plans, foreshadowing the ultimate deliverance through Jesus Christ.

Then Samson went out and caught three hundred foxes.
Samson's actions here demonstrate his extraordinary strength and cunning. The Hebrew word translated as "foxes" can also mean "jackals," which are more common in the region and often travel in packs, making them easier to catch in large numbers. This event takes place in the context of Samson's ongoing conflict with the Philistines, who were oppressing Israel at the time. The number 300 is significant in biblical narratives, often symbolizing completeness or divine intervention, as seen in Gideon's army in Judges 7. Samson's ability to catch so many animals reflects his role as a judge empowered by God to deliver Israel.

And he took torches,
The use of torches indicates a planned act of destruction. In ancient warfare, fire was a common tool for devastation, especially in agricultural societies. The torch symbolizes judgment and divine retribution, as seen in other biblical passages where fire represents God's presence or judgment, such as in the burning bush (Exodus 3) or the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19).

turned the foxes tail-to-tail,
This method of tying the animals together would ensure that they could not run in a straight line, causing more widespread damage as they panicked and ran through the fields. This act of tying the animals tail-to-tail is unique and demonstrates Samson's ingenuity. It also reflects the chaotic and destructive nature of sin and rebellion against God, as the Philistines were experiencing through their oppression of Israel.

and fastened a torch between each pair of tails.
By placing a torch between each pair of tails, Samson ensured that the fire would spread rapidly and uncontrollably. This act of sabotage was a direct attack on the Philistine economy, as agriculture was their primary source of sustenance and wealth. The fire would destroy their grain, vineyards, and olive groves, symbolizing the judgment of God upon those who oppress His people. This event foreshadows the ultimate deliverance and judgment that comes through Jesus Christ, who is described as the light of the world (John 8:12) and who brings both salvation and judgment.

Then he lit the torches
Samson's actions here are a continuation of his personal vendetta against the Philistines, who were oppressing Israel. Lighting the torches signifies the beginning of his plan to cause destruction. Fire is often used in the Bible as a symbol of judgment and purification (e.g., Malachi 3:2-3).

and released the foxes into the standing grain of the Philistines
The use of foxes (or possibly jackals, as the Hebrew word can mean either) is significant. Foxes were common in the region, and their release into the fields would cause chaos and destruction. This act of releasing them into the standing grain symbolizes a direct attack on the Philistine economy and sustenance, as grain was a staple food source.

burning up the piles of grain and the standing grain
The destruction of both the harvested and unharvested grain indicates a comprehensive devastation. This act would have had severe economic repercussions for the Philistines, as it destroyed both immediate and future food supplies. The burning of grain can be seen as a form of divine retribution, as fire often represents God's judgment (e.g., Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19).

as well as the vineyards and olive groves
Vineyards and olive groves were valuable agricultural assets in ancient Israel and Philistia, providing wine and oil, essential for daily life and religious practices. The destruction of these resources would have been a significant blow to the Philistines, affecting their economy and way of life. This act of destruction can be seen as a precursor to the ultimate deliverance of Israel from Philistine oppression, foreshadowing the complete victory that God would eventually bring through David and ultimately through Jesus Christ, who is the true deliverer.

“Who did this?” the Philistines demanded.
The Philistines, a dominant sea-faring people in the region, were known for their conflicts with Israel. Their demand reflects a culture of retribution and justice, common in ancient Near Eastern societies. This question arises after Samson's act of vengeance, which involved setting fire to the Philistines' grain fields, vineyards, and olive groves (Judges 15:4-5). The Philistines' inquiry indicates their intent to identify and punish the perpetrator, highlighting the cycle of violence between them and the Israelites.

“It was Samson, the son-in-law of the Timnite,” they were told.
Samson, a judge of Israel, was known for his extraordinary strength and tumultuous relationship with the Philistines. His marriage to a Philistine woman from Timnah was part of God's plan to confront the Philistines (Judges 14:4). The reference to him as the "son-in-law of the Timnite" underscores the personal nature of the conflict, as familial ties were significant in ancient cultures. This connection also foreshadows the tragic consequences of intermarriage with pagan nations, a recurring theme in Israel's history.

“For his wife was given to his companion.”
This phrase reveals the immediate cause of Samson's anger. His wife being given to another man, likely a friend or associate, was a grave insult and breach of trust. In ancient times, marriage arrangements were binding, and such an act would be seen as a severe dishonor. This personal betrayal fueled Samson's retaliation against the Philistines, illustrating the intertwining of personal grievances with national conflicts.

So the Philistines went up and burned her and her father to death.
The Philistines' response is brutal and reflects the harsh realities of ancient justice systems, where collective punishment was common. This act of retribution fulfills Samson's earlier threat in Judges 14:15, where the Philistines had threatened his wife with burning if she did not betray Samson's riddle. The burning of Samson's wife and her father also serves as a grim reminder of the destructive consequences of sin and disobedience, echoing the broader biblical theme of judgment. This event foreshadows the ultimate deliverance through Christ, who breaks the cycle of sin and retribution.

And Samson told them
Samson, a judge of Israel, is speaking to the Philistines. This reflects his role as a leader and deliverer of Israel, chosen by God to begin the deliverance from Philistine oppression (Judges 13:5). His communication with the Philistines highlights the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Philistines, a dominant theme in the book of Judges.

Because you have done this
The Philistines had wronged Samson by giving his wife to another man, which was a personal affront and a violation of social customs of marriage and loyalty. This act of betrayal is a catalyst for Samson's actions, illustrating the cycle of personal vendetta and retaliation common in the ancient Near Eastern culture.

I will not rest
Samson's declaration of unrest signifies his determination and the seriousness of his vow. It reflects the cultural importance of honor and retribution in ancient societies. This phrase also underscores the relentless nature of Samson's character, often driven by personal motives rather than divine instruction.

until I have taken vengeance upon you
Vengeance is a recurring theme in Samson's life, often leading to violent confrontations. This reflects the lex talionis, or law of retaliation, prevalent in ancient legal systems (Exodus 21:24). Samson's actions can be seen as a type of divine justice, albeit through flawed human execution. This foreshadows the ultimate justice and redemption found in Jesus Christ, who, unlike Samson, offers forgiveness and reconciliation.

And he struck them ruthlessly with a great slaughter
This phrase describes Samson's retaliation against the Philistines after they burned his wife and her father. The term "ruthlessly" indicates the severity and intensity of Samson's actions, reflecting the cycle of violence between the Israelites and the Philistines. The "great slaughter" signifies a significant victory for Samson, who was empowered by the Spirit of the Lord (Judges 14:19). This act of vengeance is part of the larger narrative of Samson's judgeship, where he is often seen as a flawed deliverer of Israel, prefiguring the ultimate deliverance through Christ, who would conquer sin and death.

and then went down and stayed in the cave at the rock of Etam
The "rock of Etam" is a geographical location in the territory of Judah. Caves were often used as places of refuge or hiding in ancient times, as seen in other biblical accounts (1 Samuel 22:1, 1 Kings 19:9). Samson's retreat to the cave may symbolize a temporary withdrawal from conflict, reflecting a pattern of seeking solitude after significant events, similar to how Jesus withdrew to pray (Luke 5:16). The rock of Etam's exact location is uncertain, but it is believed to be in the hill country of Judah, emphasizing the strategic and protective nature of such sites. This setting underscores the tension between Samson's role as a judge and his personal struggles, highlighting the need for a perfect deliverer, fulfilled in Jesus Christ.

Then the Philistines went up
The Philistines were a significant adversary of Israel during the time of the Judges. They were a seafaring people who settled along the coastal regions of Canaan. Their frequent incursions into Israelite territory were part of their efforts to dominate the region. This phrase indicates a military movement, suggesting an aggressive intent to confront or subdue the Israelites.

camped in Judah
Judah was one of the twelve tribes of Israel, occupying a significant portion of the southern part of the land. The Philistines' decision to camp in Judah highlights the ongoing conflict between the Israelites and the Philistines. This encampment would have been a direct threat to the tribe of Judah, indicating the Philistines' strategic interest in controlling or intimidating this area.

and deployed themselves near the town of Lehi
Lehi, meaning "jawbone," is significant in the narrative of Samson. It is the location where Samson would later defeat a thousand Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey. The deployment of the Philistines near Lehi sets the stage for this miraculous victory. The name "Lehi" itself becomes symbolic of God's deliverance through Samson, a type of Christ, who delivers His people from their enemies. The geographical positioning of the Philistines here suggests a tactical advantage, yet it ultimately becomes a place of their defeat.

“Why have you attacked us?” said the men of Judah.
The men of Judah were part of the Israelite tribes, living in the territory allotted to them. At this time, the Philistines were oppressing Israel, and the men of Judah were under their control. Their question reflects a sense of confusion and fear, as they were accustomed to Philistine dominance and were not expecting an attack. This situation highlights the Israelites' subjugation and their lack of a strong leader, which is a recurring theme in the Book of Judges. The men of Judah's reaction also shows their desire to avoid conflict with their oppressors, indicating a period of spiritual and moral decline among the Israelites.

The Philistines replied, “We have come to arrest Samson
The Philistines were a seafaring people who settled along the coastal regions of Canaan. They were known for their military prowess and were a constant threat to the Israelites during the period of the Judges. Their response indicates a specific mission to capture Samson, who had become a significant thorn in their side due to his exploits against them. Samson, a judge of Israel, was known for his extraordinary strength, which he used to challenge Philistine authority. This pursuit of Samson by the Philistines underscores the ongoing conflict between the Israelites and the Philistines, as well as the Philistines' determination to maintain control over the region.

and pay him back for what he has done to us.”
This phrase reveals the Philistines' motivation for their actions. Samson had previously inflicted significant damage on the Philistines, including burning their crops and defeating them in battle. Their desire for retribution is a common theme in the cycle of vengeance that characterizes much of the conflict in the Book of Judges. This cycle often leads to further violence and highlights the absence of peace and stability in Israel during this time. The Philistines' intent to "pay him back" also reflects the broader biblical theme of justice and retribution, which is seen throughout the Old Testament. This situation foreshadows the eventual downfall of Samson, as his personal vendettas and actions against the Philistines ultimately lead to his capture and demise.

In response, three thousand men of Judah went to the cave at the rock of Etam
The men of Judah's response indicates the gravity of the situation. The number "three thousand" suggests a significant concern for their safety and the need to confront Samson with a large group, highlighting the fear and respect Samson commanded. The "cave at the rock of Etam" is a specific location, possibly a stronghold or a place of refuge. Etam is mentioned in 1 Chronicles 4:32 as a town in the territory of Judah, suggesting a strategic or symbolic significance. This setting underscores the tension between Samson and his own people, who are under Philistine oppression.

and they asked Samson, “Do you not realize that the Philistines rule over us?
This question reflects the subjugation of the Israelites under Philistine control during this period. The Philistines were a dominant force in the region, and their rule over Israel is a recurring theme in the Book of Judges. The men of Judah's question reveals their resignation to this oppression and their fear of further retaliation. It also highlights a lack of faith or understanding of God's deliverance through Samson, who was raised as a judge to begin to deliver Israel from the Philistines (Judges 13:5).

What have you done to us?”
The men of Judah express concern over the consequences of Samson's actions, fearing retribution from the Philistines. This question indicates a communal mindset where individual actions are seen in the context of their impact on the entire community. It also shows a lack of unity and support for Samson's divinely appointed mission, contrasting with the expected solidarity among the tribes of Israel.

“I have done to them what they did to me,” he replied.
Samson's response is one of personal retribution, reflecting the lex talionis principle, or the law of retaliation, which is seen in the Old Testament (Exodus 21:23-25). His actions are driven by personal vendetta rather than a collective deliverance strategy. This phrase also highlights Samson's flawed character, as he often acts out of personal motives rather than divine guidance. Despite this, God uses Samson's actions to fulfill His purposes, illustrating how God can work through imperfect individuals to achieve His plans. Samson's life can be seen as a type of Christ in that he is a deliverer of Israel, though imperfect, pointing to the ultimate deliverer, Jesus Christ, who perfectly fulfills God's will.

But they said to him
This phrase refers to the men of Judah speaking to Samson. The context is that Samson has taken refuge in the territory of Judah after his conflict with the Philistines. The men of Judah are acting out of fear of the Philistines, who are oppressing them. This reflects the broader theme in Judges of Israel's repeated cycles of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance.

“We have come down to arrest you
The men of Judah are willing to capture Samson to appease the Philistines, highlighting their subjugation and fear. This action shows a lack of faith in God's deliverance through Samson, who was raised as a judge to deliver Israel. It also underscores the internal strife and lack of unity among the Israelites during this period.

and hand you over to the Philistines.”
The Philistines were a dominant force in the region, and their oppression of Israel is a recurring theme in the book of Judges. The willingness of the men of Judah to hand over Samson indicates their desperation and the extent of Philistine control. This act of betrayal contrasts with the expected loyalty among the tribes of Israel.

Samson replied,
Samson's response is significant as it shows his awareness of the situation and his strategic thinking. Despite his personal flaws, Samson is portrayed as a divinely appointed judge with a mission to begin delivering Israel from the Philistines.

“Swear to me that you will not kill me yourselves.”
Samson's request for assurance from the men of Judah reflects his understanding of their fear and his desire to avoid unnecessary bloodshed among his own people. This request also demonstrates his confidence in his God-given strength to deal with the Philistines himself. It can be seen as a type of Christ, who was also betrayed by His own people but ultimately overcame His enemies.

“No,” they answered,
This response comes from the men of Judah, who are speaking to Samson. The context is a negotiation between Samson and his fellow Israelites, who are under Philistine oppression. The Israelites are attempting to avoid further conflict with the Philistines by handing Samson over. This reflects the Israelites' fear and subjugation under Philistine rule, highlighting their lack of faith in God's deliverance through Samson.

“we will not kill you,
The men of Judah assure Samson that they will not harm him themselves. This promise indicates a level of respect or fear for Samson, acknowledging his role as a judge and deliverer of Israel. It also reflects the cultural and legal norms of the time, where blood vengeance and familial ties were significant, and killing a fellow Israelite could lead to internal conflict.

but we will tie you up securely
The act of tying Samson securely suggests a desire to ensure he cannot escape or cause harm. This reflects the Israelites' pragmatic approach to dealing with the Philistines, prioritizing their immediate safety over trust in Samson's divine mission. The use of ropes also symbolizes the Israelites' spiritual bondage and lack of faith, as they rely on human means rather than divine intervention.

and hand you over to them.”
The intention to hand Samson over to the Philistines shows the Israelites' desperation to appease their oppressors. This act of betrayal is reminiscent of other biblical instances where God's chosen leaders face rejection by their own people, such as Joseph being sold by his brothers or Jesus being handed over by Judas. It underscores the recurring theme of God's deliverers being misunderstood and rejected.

So they bound him with two new ropes
The use of "two new ropes" emphasizes the Israelites' determination to ensure Samson's captivity. New ropes would be stronger and less likely to break, indicating their fear of his strength. This detail foreshadows the miraculous nature of Samson's eventual escape, as it highlights the futility of human efforts against God's power. The binding of Samson can also be seen as a type of Christ, who was bound and led to crucifixion, yet ultimately triumphed over death.

and led him up from the rock.
The phrase "led him up from the rock" suggests a geographical movement from a place of refuge or hiding. The rock may symbolize a place of strength or divine protection, as rocks often do in biblical literature. This movement away from the rock can be seen as a departure from God's protection due to the Israelites' lack of faith. It also sets the stage for God's power to be displayed through Samson's subsequent actions, reinforcing the theme of deliverance despite human failure.

When Samson arrived in Lehi
Lehi is a location in ancient Israel, significant in the narrative of Samson. The name "Lehi" means "jawbone," which is fitting given the events that follow in the chapter. This area was under Philistine control during the time of the Judges, a period characterized by cycles of Israelite disobedience, oppression by foreign powers, cries for deliverance, and the rise of judges like Samson. Samson's arrival in Lehi marks a pivotal moment in his conflict with the Philistines, who were a dominant force in the region.

the Philistines came out shouting against him
The Philistines were a seafaring people who settled along the coastal regions of Canaan. They were often in conflict with the Israelites, as seen throughout the book of Judges. Their shouting signifies both a war cry and a display of confidence in their ability to capture Samson, who had been a thorn in their side. This moment reflects the ongoing struggle between the Israelites and the Philistines, a theme that continues into the reigns of Saul and David.

And the Spirit of the LORD came mightily upon him
The Spirit of the LORD empowering individuals is a recurring theme in the Old Testament, particularly in the book of Judges. This divine empowerment is not indicative of Samson's personal righteousness but rather God's sovereign choice to use him as an instrument of deliverance for Israel. The Spirit's coming upon Samson mightily signifies a supernatural strength and ability, reminiscent of other judges like Gideon and Jephthah, who were also empowered by the Spirit to deliver Israel from oppression.

The ropes on his arms became like burnt flax
Flax, when burnt, becomes weak and brittle, easily broken. This imagery highlights the miraculous nature of Samson's deliverance. The ropes, which were meant to bind him securely, become ineffective under the power of the Spirit. This transformation from strong to weak symbolizes God's ability to overturn human constraints and reflects the theme of divine intervention in seemingly impossible situations.

and the bonds broke loose from his hands
The breaking of the bonds signifies liberation and foreshadows the victory Samson is about to achieve over the Philistines. This act of breaking free is symbolic of Israel's potential deliverance from their oppressors when they turn to God. It also prefigures the ultimate deliverance found in Jesus Christ, who breaks the bonds of sin and death for humanity. Samson's physical liberation here is a type of the spiritual liberation that Christ offers.

He found the fresh jawbone of a donkey
The jawbone of a donkey is significant as it was an unconventional weapon, highlighting God's ability to use the ordinary for extraordinary purposes. In the context of ancient Israel, donkeys were common animals, and their bones would have been readily available. The term "fresh" suggests that the jawbone was still strong and not brittle, making it an effective tool for combat. This event occurs during a time when the Philistines were oppressing Israel, and Samson was raised as a judge to deliver them. The use of a jawbone also underscores the theme of God empowering the weak or seemingly insignificant to achieve His purposes, reminiscent of David's use of a sling against Goliath.

reached out his hand and took it
Samson's action of reaching out and taking the jawbone demonstrates his initiative and willingness to act in faith. This phrase emphasizes the personal responsibility and courage required to step into God's calling. It also reflects the biblical principle that God often requires human cooperation to accomplish His divine plans. Samson's act can be seen as a type of Christ, who willingly took on the role of Savior, using what was available to fulfill God's mission.

and struck down a thousand men
The defeat of a thousand men with a single jawbone is a testament to the supernatural strength given to Samson by the Spirit of the Lord. This miraculous victory serves as a reminder of God's power to deliver His people against overwhelming odds. It parallels other biblical accounts where God grants victory to His chosen leaders, such as Gideon's defeat of the Midianites with just 300 men. This event foreshadows the ultimate victory of Christ over sin and death, achieved through His sacrificial death and resurrection. The number "thousand" often symbolizes completeness or a large multitude in Scripture, emphasizing the totality of the victory God provided through Samson.

Then Samson said:
This phrase introduces a declaration by Samson, a judge of Israel known for his extraordinary strength. His words often reflect his impulsive and vengeful nature, as seen throughout his narrative in the Book of Judges. Samson's actions and statements are frequently direct responses to personal grievances, highlighting the cycle of retribution prevalent in the period of the Judges.

With the jawbone of a donkey:
The jawbone of a donkey is an unconventional weapon, emphasizing the theme of God using the weak or unexpected to achieve His purposes. This reflects the broader biblical motif where God empowers individuals with seemingly inadequate resources, as seen with David and his sling (1 Samuel 17) or Gideon and his small army (Judges 7). The use of a donkey's jawbone also underscores the improvisational nature of Samson's battles, relying on what is immediately available.

I have piled them into heaps:
This phrase suggests a significant victory, with the imagery of heaps indicating a large number of defeated foes. It reflects the hyperbolic language often used in ancient Near Eastern literature to describe military triumphs. The piling of bodies can also symbolize the completeness of the victory and the overwhelming power granted to Samson by God.

With the jawbone of a donkey:
The repetition of this phrase emphasizes the miraculous nature of the victory. It serves to remind the reader of the unlikely means by which God delivers His people. This repetition also highlights the personal nature of Samson's strength, which is both a divine gift and a source of personal pride, often leading to his downfall.

I have slain a thousand men:
This statement underscores the magnitude of the victory and the supernatural strength bestowed upon Samson. The number "thousand" is often used in the Bible to signify completeness or a large quantity, rather than a precise count. This victory serves as a testament to God's power working through Samson, despite his personal flaws. It also foreshadows the ultimate deliverance that God provides through Jesus Christ, who conquers sin and death, not through physical might, but through sacrifice and resurrection.

And when Samson had finished speaking
Samson's speech follows his victory over the Philistines using the jawbone of a donkey. This moment highlights his role as a judge and deliverer of Israel, empowered by the Spirit of the Lord. His words likely reflect a sense of triumph and divine empowerment, similar to the songs of victory found in Exodus 15:1-18 and Judges 5:1-31.

he cast the jawbone from his hand
The act of casting away the jawbone signifies the end of the immediate conflict and the temporary nature of the tool used for deliverance. It symbolizes the transient nature of earthly weapons compared to divine power. This action can be compared to David's reliance on God rather than Saul's armor in 1 Samuel 17:38-40.

and he named that place Ramath-lehi
"Ramath-lehi" translates to "the hill of the jawbone." Naming places after significant events was a common practice in biblical times, serving as a memorial to God's intervention. This act of naming is reminiscent of other biblical figures who named locations to commemorate divine encounters, such as Jacob naming Bethel in Genesis 28:19. The location serves as a testament to God's deliverance and Samson's role as a judge.

And being very thirsty
Samson's physical thirst highlights his human vulnerability despite his supernatural strength. This moment of weakness contrasts with his previous triumph over the Philistines, emphasizing the dependency of even the strongest individuals on God for sustenance. Thirst is a recurring biblical motif symbolizing spiritual longing (Psalm 42:1-2).

Samson cried out to the LORD
This marks a rare instance of Samson directly praying to God, indicating a moment of humility and recognition of divine authority. It reflects the biblical theme of calling upon the Lord in times of distress (Psalm 18:6). Samson's prayer shows a shift from self-reliance to seeking divine intervention.

“You have accomplished this great deliverance through Your servant.
Samson acknowledges that the victory over the Philistines was not by his own strength but by God's power. This confession aligns with the biblical principle that God is the source of all deliverance (Psalm 44:3). The term "servant" indicates Samson's role as an instrument of God's will, similar to other judges and prophets.

Must I now die of thirst
Samson's question underscores the irony of achieving a great victory only to face death from a basic need. It reflects the human tendency to doubt God's provision after experiencing His power. This echoes Israel's complaints in the wilderness (Exodus 17:3), where physical needs tested faith.

and fall into the hands of the uncircumcised?”
The term "uncircumcised" refers to the Philistines, highlighting the covenantal distinction between Israel and its enemies. Circumcision was a sign of the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 17:10-14), and Samson's concern reflects the shame of being defeated by those outside God's covenant. This phrase underscores the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Philistines, a central theme in the narrative of Judges.

So God opened up the hollow place in Lehi
This phrase highlights God's direct intervention in response to Samson's need. The "hollow place" in Lehi refers to a geographical location, possibly a rock or a depression in the ground. This miraculous provision of water parallels other biblical instances where God provides water, such as when Moses struck the rock at Horeb (Exodus 17:6). The name "Lehi" means "jawbone," which is significant as it connects to the earlier event where Samson used a jawbone to defeat the Philistines (Judges 15:15).

and water came out of it
The provision of water is a recurring theme in Scripture, symbolizing God's sustenance and life-giving power. This event can be seen as a type of Christ, who offers "living water" (John 4:10) to those who are spiritually thirsty. The miraculous nature of the water coming forth underscores God's ability to provide for His people in seemingly impossible situations.

When Samson drank, his strength returned, and he was revived
Samson's physical revival after drinking the water signifies the restoration and renewal that comes from God's provision. This can be compared to spiritual renewal found in Christ, who strengthens believers (Philippians 4:13). The act of drinking and being revived also echoes the spiritual refreshment and strength that believers receive through the Holy Spirit.

That is why he named it En-hakkore
The name "En-hakkore" means "Spring of the Caller" or "Spring of the One who Calls." This naming reflects Samson's acknowledgment of God's response to his cry for help. Naming places after divine interventions was a common practice in biblical times, serving as a memorial of God's faithfulness and power (Genesis 28:19, where Jacob names Bethel).

and it remains in Lehi to this day
This phrase indicates the lasting impact of God's miracle, suggesting that the site became a known landmark. The mention of its continued existence serves as a testament to the historical reliability of the account and God's enduring faithfulness. It also implies that the story of God's provision was passed down through generations, reinforcing the importance of remembering and recounting God's deeds.

And Samson judged Israel
Samson's role as a judge was unique compared to other judges in the Book of Judges. Unlike others who led military campaigns, Samson's leadership was more personal and individualistic. His judgeship was marked by his extraordinary physical strength, which was a gift from God, and his Nazirite vow, which set him apart for divine purposes. The role of a judge in Israel was not only to lead in battle but also to provide guidance and deliverance from oppression. Samson's life, however, was a mix of personal failings and divine empowerment, reflecting the complex relationship between God and His chosen leaders.

for twenty years
The twenty-year period of Samson's judgeship is significant as it represents a substantial time of leadership during the era of the judges, which was characterized by cycles of sin, oppression, repentance, and deliverance. This period suggests that despite his personal flaws, Samson was able to provide a measure of stability and resistance against the Philistines. The number twenty in biblical terms can symbolize a period of waiting or completeness, indicating that Samson's judgeship fulfilled a specific purpose in God's plan for Israel.

in the days of the Philistines.
The Philistines were a dominant force in the region during this time, often oppressing the Israelites. They were a seafaring people who settled along the coastal regions of Canaan and were known for their advanced iron technology, which gave them a military advantage. The phrase "in the days of the Philistines" highlights the context of oppression under which Samson operated. This period was marked by frequent conflicts between the Israelites and the Philistines, setting the stage for Samson's acts of defiance against them. The Philistine oppression is a recurring theme in the narrative of Judges, illustrating the consequences of Israel's disobedience to God and their need for deliverance.