Why omit Mark 16:9–20 in some texts?
In Mark 16:9–20, why do some manuscripts omit these verses, and what does that imply about their authenticity?

Introduction to Mark 16:9–20

Mark 16:9–20 contains a series of post-Resurrection appearances and instructions attributed to Jesus. Yet, some ancient manuscripts either place a note about these verses, include a shorter ending, or omit them entirely. This difference has raised questions about the authenticity and authority of Mark’s final verses. Below is an exhaustive topical entry examining the manuscript evidence, historical witness, and theological implications.


Manuscript Evidence

Early Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Mark vary in how they present or omit these verses. Two notable 4th-century uncials—Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ) and Codex Vaticanus (B)—end the Gospel at Mark 16:8, omitting verses 9–20 explicitly. However, other ancient codices, such as Codex Alexandrinus (5th century) and Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (5th century), include the longer ending.

Additionally, some manuscripts feature what is sometimes called the “shorter ending,” which concludes more abruptly. Others have both the shorter ending and the longer ending combined. This variety points to an ancient question about where Mark’s Gospel may have originally concluded.


Patristic References and Early Christian Writers

1. Irenaeus (2nd century) quotes from near the end of Mark, suggesting his copy included the longer ending.

2. Tatian’s Diatessaron (2nd century), an early Gospel harmony, integrates verses that appear to align with Mark 16:9–20, indicating those verses were accepted in many Christian communities.

3. Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century) suggests that these verses were found in some manuscripts but not in others, reflecting the discussion that existed even in his day.

Patristic evidence reveals that the longer ending was known and quoted by some early believers, while other sources recognized valid copies that ended at verse 8 or noted the disputed status of these verses.


Possible Explanations for the Omission

1. Accidental Loss: Some scholars propose that the final leaf of an early Mark codex was lost. If Mark’s Gospel was written on a scroll or codex whose last page became detached, later copies might have inadvertently ended at verse 8.

2. Intentional Scribal Note: Others suggest that a scribe or community might have hesitated to include the final verses based on doctrinal caution or confusion over their source.

3. Editorial Decision: Copyists aware of the text’s disputed status might have flagged it or removed it to avoid confusion in public readings.


Implications for Authenticity

1. Doctrinal Consistency: Although Mark 16:9–20 is shorter in some manuscripts, it does not contradict the message of the other Gospels. Key elements—such as the Resurrection and appearances of Jesus—are attested elsewhere (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:3–8, Luke 24:1–53, John 20:1–31).

2. External Attestation: Early church writers like Irenaeus attest to the early acceptance of these verses. This external testimony supports their antiquity.

3. Quoted Content: Even Eusebius, while noting the debate, does not dismiss these verses outright. Their inclusion in multiple major manuscripts, such as Codex Alexandrinus, gives weight to their historical usage and liturgical recognition in many Christian communities.


Textual Considerations

The Gospel of Mark often has a concise style. Some suggest the abrupt ending at verse 8 fits Mark’s tendency toward brevity, while others find such an ending unusual (ending with fear and silence) and thus argue for a missing or original longer conclusion.

From a textual critical standpoint, the question revolves around which textual tradition better represents the autograph (the original document). The argument can be made that the longer ending was part of a very ancient tradition, though some of the earliest surviving copies omit it. The presence of varying endings in ancient manuscripts is a hallmark of Mark’s textual history.


Notable Quotations (Berean Standard Bible)

• “Early on the first day of the week, after Jesus had risen, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene …” (Mark 16:9).

• “… go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.” (Mark 16:15).

Though some manuscripts mark these verses with caution, many Christians throughout history have embraced them as part of Scripture’s witness to the Resurrection and the Great Commission.


Relevance in Christian Practice and Theology

1. Great Commission: These verses affirm the mission to “preach the gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15). Regardless of the manuscript question, believers widely accept the commission to evangelize; it also appears in Matthew 28:18–20.

2. Signs and Wonders: Mark 16:9–20 references miraculous signs accompanying the apostles. Early Christian literature (Acts) and subsequent church history testify to healings, conversions, and other remarkable events.

3. Consistency with Resurrection Accounts: The risen Jesus appearing to Mary Magdalene connects with John 20:11–18, affirming the harmony between Mark’s ending and the broader Gospel tradition.


Archaeological and Historical Corroboration

• Ancient lectionaries (worship reading schedules) in the Eastern church often include Mark 16:9–20 for post-Easter readings.

• Early translations like the Syriac and Latin Vulgate also include the longer ending, underscoring that, regionally, many branches of the church recognized it.

• Church fathers quoting these verses show not only textual diffusion but also doctrinal acceptance, shedding light on how early Christian communities cherished the full scope of the Resurrection message.


Conclusion

The question of whether Mark originally ended at verse 8 or included verses 9–20 has been part of scholarly discussion since the early centuries of the Church. Some manuscripts do omit the longer ending, and yet a substantial body of historical, patristic, and manuscript evidence supports its antiquity and widespread acceptance.

Even those conservative textual critics who acknowledge the debate often conclude that Mark 16:9–20 can be read in harmony with the rest of Scripture—especially regarding Christ’s post-Resurrection appearances and the commission to share the gospel worldwide. As it stands in most Bible editions today, Mark 16:9–20 testifies to core truths about the Resurrection and the ongoing work of Jesus among His followers, resonating with the unified message found throughout the New Testament.

Evidence for Joseph's role in Jesus' burial?
Top of Page
Top of Page