Why does God allow genocides to happen, including those commanded in the Bible (Numbers 31:17-18)? Understanding the Biblical Text (Numbers 31:17–18) “Now therefore kill all the boys, and kill every woman who has slept with a man, but spare for yourselves every girl who has never slept with a man.” (Numbers 31:17–18) These verses record a command to the Israelites in their conflict with the Midianites. At first glance, they raise difficult questions about why God would allow—or even command—such severe actions. Below is a comprehensive exploration addressing these concerns, drawing both from Scripture (Berean Standard Bible) and relevant historical, archaeological, and theological considerations. 1. The Context of Midianite Hostility The Midianites, in conjunction with Moab (Numbers 25:1–9), had initiated a campaign of seduction and idolatry among the Israelites. This led to significant spiritual and moral corruption, threatening the covenant community established for a unique redemptive purpose (Genesis 12:3). In the ancient Near East, clans or tribes frequently enticed other nations into their idol-worship, a practice that often involved grave immorality and, at times, child sacrifice (Leviticus 18:21; Deuteronomy 12:31). The judgment on Midian must be seen against this background: it was not mere retaliation but a measure to prevent further destructive corruption among the covenant people, who were to be a conduit of blessing and revelation (Genesis 18:18). 2. The Severity of Judgment and Divine Holiness Scripture consistently emphasizes that God is righteous and holy (Psalm 99:9). When a society’s collective evil reaches a point of no return, divine judgment can manifest in drastic ways (Genesis 15:16). In the case of the Midianites, their alliances and actions threatened Israel’s very calling. The commands in Numbers 31 reflect an extraordinary situation within a theocratic covenant context, where God used Israel as an instrument of judgment. This does not imply volatility in God’s character; rather, it illustrates a deliberate, solemn execution of justice. The broader scriptural narrative shows that God’s holiness and moral perfection necessitate the removal of pervasive evil, ensuring that future generations are not enslaved by ongoing corruption (Deuteronomy 20:16–18, a parallel passage regarding certain Canaanite nations). 3. Specific Flames of Judgment: Why Such Extremes? Some biblical passages describe the punishment of entire communities, raising the question of why even children were not spared. Several factors emerge: 1. Preventing Irreparable Harm: The culture and idolatrous practices of the Midianites were deeply entrenched. The text portrays an existential threat to Israel’s purity of worship and moral practice (Numbers 25:1–3). 2. Corporate Responsibility in the Ancient World: In ancient societies, families and tribes were tightly bound. The perpetuation of idolatrous and destructive practices invariably passed to subsequent generations (Exodus 20:5). 3. Preservation of Redemptive History: The Israelites were entrusted with safeguarding the line through which the Messiah would come (Galatians 3:16). The infiltration of widespread idolatry would jeopardize the unique identity meant to herald salvation for the whole world (John 4:22). Scripture does not present these judgments as arbitrary or cruel acts. They are consistently portrayed as responses to nations whose behaviors—oppressive, violent, and idolatrous—had reached a threshold of extreme depravity (Leviticus 18:24–25). 4. The Nature of God’s Justice Biblically, God’s justice is neither spiteful nor impulsive. Rather, Scripture reveals a pattern of patience and warnings before judgment (2 Peter 3:9). In the Old Testament, the Creator often allows long periods of repentance (for example, the Canaanites’ “iniquity was not yet complete” in Genesis 15:16). Only after unheeded warnings and continued violence or idolatry would judgment fall. In the example of Midian, Israel’s conflict arose after the Midianites instigated harrowing moral pitfalls for the Israelites (Numbers 25:6–9). The subsequent command was given in a specific historical-theocratic setting, rooted in divine prerogatives far beyond human political motives. 5. Historical and Archaeological Corroborations Archaeological and textual studies support the general historicity of Israel’s clashes with surrounding nations. Excavations in the broader Levant region, combined with ancient inscriptions, show that conflicts often stemmed from fundamental religious and cultural differences. While direct artifacts linking specifically to Numbers 31 are scarce, the consistent pattern of warfare described in the Old Testament aligns with well-documented ancient Near Eastern practices. Additionally, evidence from related epochs—such as the discovery of child-sacrifice remains in certain Phoenician and Canaanite sites—helps illustrate the gravity of practices that the biblical text repeatedly condemns (Leviticus 18:21; Jeremiah 7:31). These findings contextualize the moral corruption that could prompt divine judgment. 6. Consistency with God’s Character in the Broader Canon Peering beyond the Old Testament, the New Testament reinforces the scriptural depiction of God as both just and loving (Romans 3:25–26). The Old and New Testaments unite in affirming that God must address evil but also extends mercy to all who repent (Ezekiel 33:11; 2 Peter 3:9). • Holiness and Mercy: The same God who executed judgment in ancient Israel’s history also orchestrated a path of salvation for humanity through Jesus Christ (John 3:16–17). • Unique Theocratic Context: The wars and judgments in the Old Testament primarily involve Israel as a covenant nation uniquely commissioned to uproot entrenched wickedness in their immediate region (Deuteronomy 7:2). This commission does not carry over to modern cultures where no theocratic mandate exists. • Redemptive Purpose: Through Israel’s preservation, the world gained the revelation of salvation in the person of Jesus Christ. Even the harsh judgments served the broader plan, ultimately offering hope to all nations (Matthew 28:19). 7. Philosophical Reflection: Moral Authority and Ultimate Good From a philosophical standpoint, if God is the ultimate source of morality (Psalm 119:68), the prerogative to judge rests on divine authority rather than human preference. In Scripture, human life is God’s to give and take (Job 1:21). This does not diminish moral wrestling, but it centers the discussion on God’s righteous governance of creation. • Sovereign Judgment: God’s perspective on evil incorporates both immediate and eternal dimensions. • Temporal vs. Eternal Outcomes: From a spiritual perspective, Scripture teaches that eternal realities are of greater magnitude than earthly sufferings (2 Corinthians 4:17–18). Even catastrophic events in history are understood within a broader, eternal narrative. 8. Practical Takeaways for Today Modern readers encountering accounts such as Numbers 31:17–18 can glean principles without concluding these events are directly prescriptive for current circumstances: 1. Recognition of Sin’s Seriousness: The severe actions underscore the destructive power of sin and the lengths to which holiness must go to address corruption. 2. Reliance on Divine Understanding: Human knowledge is finite; divine judgments in Scripture reflect omniscient insight into the hearts and futures of entire peoples. 3. Promise of Redemptive Hope: Even amid historical judgments, the Bible’s overarching trajectory points toward redemption, culminating in Christ’s resurrection. 9. Conclusion: Trust in the Righteous Judge The question “Why does God allow genocides to happen—including those commanded in the Bible?” is deeply challenging. Biblical teaching offers several converging insights: • God acts within holiness and justice, informed by His infinite knowledge. • Situations involving divine commands to eliminate entire groups are uniquely tied to covenant and redemptive history. • The severity of judgment correlates with radical depravity and entrenched iniquity. • Throughout Scripture, from the earliest passages to the resurrection of Christ, God’s overarching aim is to restore and redeem. Any final assessment rests on the premise that God, who sees every dimension of human history, acts in perfect justice and mercy. While the judgments in Numbers 31 appear stark when read in isolation, the broader biblical witness reveals a coherent truth: God actively pursues the elimination of evil and the redemption of His creation (Revelation 21:4). The gravity of these events ultimately exalts His holiness and highlights humanity’s need for repentance and salvation (Romans 3:23–24). |
    |