Why avoid casting pearls before swine?
Why did Jesus advise against casting pearls before swine?

Definition and Biblical Context

Matthew 7:6 states, “Do not give dogs what is holy; do not cast your pearls before swine. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and then turn and tear you to pieces.” This instruction appears within the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), a teaching discourse that emphasizes genuine righteousness, proper discernment, and faith-filled conduct. In this verse, “pearls” are typically understood as valuable teachings or divine truths, and “swine” symbolizes those who treat such truths with contempt or hostility.

Understanding the Imagery of Pearls and Swine

1. Pearls as Priceless Insights

In scriptural imagery, pearls are associated with great worth (cf. Matthew 13:45–46). Christ’s teachings, the message of salvation, and the riches of divine wisdom are depicted as treasures beyond measure (Proverbs 2:4–5). By likening such truths to “pearls,” the verse underscores their precious nature.

2. Swine in a Jewish Context

In the customs of ancient Israel, swine were considered ritually unclean (Leviticus 11:7). They frequently represented something impure or unholy (Isaiah 66:3). To place precious pearls before swine, expecting them to appreciate their value, becomes a paradox: the swine have no capacity to value these treasures.

Biblical Background and Parallel Verses

1. Discernment in Proclaiming Truth

Jesus’s caution in Matthew 7:6 stands in tandem with other passages urging believers to exercise wisdom and discernment. For instance, Proverbs 9:7–8 warns that correcting a scoffer may lead to scorn and abuse. These statements do not forbid sharing truth; rather, they emphasize prudence in how and when it is presented.

2. Responses of Hostility and Contempt

The final clause, “then turn and tear you to pieces,” warns that hostile audiences might violently reject truth and harm those who offer it. This theme echoes throughout Scripture and early Christian experiences (Acts 13:44–46). In certain instances, continued confrontation only increases animosity rather than fostering repentance.

Purpose and Theological Implications

1. Protecting What Is Holy

“Do not give dogs what is holy” highlights a protective stance towards sacred matters. Throughout the Bible, those charged with teaching truth are reminded to handle it responsibly (2 Timothy 2:15). Believers must avoid futile or destructive situations where repeated rejection of divine truth leads to its further profanation.

2. Discernment vs. Avoiding Evangelism

This verse does not instruct believers to remain silent about the gospel. Christ’s followers elsewhere receive a clear directive to share the good news with all (Matthew 28:19–20). Instead, the Lord calls for discernment in how one distributes truth, guided by the Spirit’s leading (Acts 16:6–7).

3. Respect for Free Will

Scripture attests repeatedly that individuals retain the power to accept or reject divine truth (Deuteronomy 30:19). The “pearls before swine” illustration acknowledges that some hearts remain hardened. Continual exposure to holy teachings can provoke hostility if individuals vehemently resist. The directive allows for respecting their choice when it becomes clear they have no intention to embrace the message.

Practical Application

1. Assessing Receptivity

Believers are encouraged to prayerfully discern when to continue sharing deeper biblical truths. This process might include observing an individual’s openness, asking clarifying questions, and being attentive to clear, repeated hostility or mockery of the message.

2. Avoiding Fruitless Conflict

Proverbs 26:4 cautions against engaging with someone who only belittles the discussion. Persisting in debates under these circumstances can feed contention and dishonor the sacredness of Scripture. Exercising wisdom shields both the messenger and the message from needless ridicule.

3. Shrewd Evangelism

The principle in Matthew 7:6 does not prohibit evangelism but calls for strategic interactions. This can involve adjusting the vocabulary used, the timing of the conversation, or the specific aspects of the truth shared. The method of approach should be seasonable (Colossians 4:5–6).

Relevant Anecdotal and Historical Considerations

1. Early Christian Missionary Strategy

In the book of Acts, Paul and Barnabas at times redirected their preaching when encountering persistent opposition (Acts 13:50–51). Their example aligns with Jesus’s teaching: after repeated rejection of the gospel, they moved on to more receptive areas.

2. Points of Proof and Validation

While the message remains universal, the hardness of certain listeners’ hearts means the conversation may become adversarial. Early Christian writings, including parts of the Didache, advised believers to be cautious with those who insult and mock sacred truths, lest it encourage further blasphemy.

Conclusion

Jesus’s admonition not to cast pearls before swine serves as a guiding principle for discernment, wisdom, and respect for the sacredness of divine truth. By comparing valuable teachings to precious pearls and those who scorn them to swine, this instruction highlights the need to guard holy truths from being trampled upon.

The call is not to withhold good news but to recognize when a person is adamantly resistant and potentially dismissive or hostile. In those situations, believers maintain respect for the holiness of God’s message by withdrawing from fruitless debate. Instead, they can focus on praying and waiting for more opportune moments or open hearts, remembering that the message itself remains freely offered to all who will receive it.

What defines a prayer meeting?
Top of Page
Top of Page