Did Jesus die before or after the temple curtain was torn? Yes (Matt 27:50-51; Mark 15:37-38) No (Luke 23:45-46). Context of the Question The accounts in Matthew, Mark, and Luke each describe the final moments of Jesus on the cross, including His last breath and the tearing of the temple curtain. At first glance, some readers have asked whether Jesus died before the curtain was torn (as presented in Matthew and Mark) or after (as implied in Luke). A careful reading reveals a harmonious picture that centers on the same essential event: Christ’s sacrifice coinciding with the supernatural tearing of the temple veil. Relevant Scripture Passages Matthew 27:50–51: “When Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, He yielded up His spirit. At that moment the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom…” Mark 15:37–38: “But Jesus let out a loud cry and breathed His last. And the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.” Luke 23:44–46: “It was now about the sixth hour, and darkness came over all the land until the ninth hour. The sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was torn down the middle. Then Jesus called out in a loud voice, ‘Father, into Your hands I commit My spirit.’ And when He had said this, He breathed His last.” Textual Considerations 1. John’s Parallel: While the Gospel of John does not mention the tearing of the temple curtain, it confirms that Jesus died with a final declaration (“It is finished,” John 19:30), which harmonizes with the descriptions in the other Synoptics. 2. Close Temporal Proximity: In Matthew and Mark, the text indicates Jesus’ death immediately followed His loud cry, and then the tearing of the veil is reported. In Luke’s account, the veil is mentioned before Jesus’ final words. The sequence in Luke can be understood as either describing events that occurred virtually simultaneously or providing a thematic note (the cosmic signs) just as Jesus was about to die. 3. Greek Grammar and Narrative Flow: The Greek conjunctions in these passages often serve to showcase events that coincide in time or reveal multiple facets of the same moment. Each Gospel writer arranges the details in a slightly different order to highlight theological themes—rather than intending to produce a minute-by-minute timeline. Examining the Tearing of the Veil 1. Symbolic Understanding: The tearing of the temple curtain (commonly understood to refer to the inner curtain separating the Holy of Holies) symbolizes the new access to God’s presence that Jesus’ atoning death provides (cf. Hebrews 10:19–20). This profound event is central to all three Synoptic accounts. 2. Historical Plausibility: Multiple early sources and Jewish historical references (e.g., writings attributed to the first-century historian Josephus) confirm the grandeur of the temple veil, making a spontaneous tear from top to bottom a significant supernatural sign. 3. Theological Emphasis: Matthew and Mark strongly underscore the immediate effect of Christ’s death, whereas Luke highlights the cosmic disturbances (darkness and the rending of the veil) in conjunction with Jesus’ final statement of trust in the Father. Reconciling the Timelines 1. Simultaneity Rather Than Strict Sequence: The moment Jesus “yielded up His spirit” (Matthew 27:50) and “breathed His last” (Mark 15:37; Luke 23:46) is the same moment in each account. Matthew and Mark place the tearing of the veil immediately after Jesus’ death, focusing on the direct outcome of His sacrifice. Luke places mention of the torn curtain in verse 45, then highlights Jesus’ final words. 2. Reason for Luke’s Order: It appears Luke brings together the cosmic signs (the darkness and the splitting of the veil) in one statement (Luke 23:44–45) to emphasize the magnitude of events preceding Jesus’ final words. Then, in verse 46, Luke records Jesus’ actual final outcry and death. From all three Gospels, it is clear that these events happened almost simultaneously. 3. Consistency of All Accounts: Each Gospel writer presents the same cluster of events: loud cry, final breath, temple veil tearing, and cosmic signs. The minor differences in placement serve each author’s narrative purpose and do not indicate a contradiction. Historical and Archaeological Support 1. Temple Structure: Archaeological and historical studies of the Second Temple period confirm the curtain was large and thick. Tearing it from top to bottom would be noteworthy enough that multiple Gospel writers would include it as a supernatural sign. 2. Reliability of Manuscripts: Existing manuscript evidence—fragments and codices (such as Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus)—reflect a consistent reading of these verses. There is no major text-type tradition that places the events in a contradictory order. Theological Importance 1. Access to God: The immediate tearing of the temple veil underscores the redemptive work of Christ. He is the perfect sacrifice that removes the barrier between sinful humanity and God (Hebrews 9:11–12; 10:19–20). 2. Fulfillment of Prophecy: These events fulfill Old Testament types and prophecies regarding the Messiah’s role in atoning for sin, thus ushering in a new covenant relationship with God. 3. Unity of the Gospels: In focusing on slightly different facets, the Gospel writers collectively show that Jesus’ final breath and the torn veil form a single salvific moment of cosmic and spiritual significance. Conclusion The Gospels agree that Jesus died at the culmination of cataclysmic signs, including the tearing of the temple curtain. Matthew and Mark note His death just before mentioning the torn veil, while Luke places the detail of the torn veil alongside the cosmic darkness shortly before Jesus’ last words. Examined together, these accounts affirm the same reality: the temple veil was supernaturally torn in connection with Jesus’ final breath, signifying that through His sacrificial death, believers have access into the very presence of God. All three narratives present a coherent picture when understood as interdependent accounts of a single set of events. Rather than contradicting each other, the different emphases highlight the momentous significance of this event for salvation history. |
    |