2 Chronicles 18:29
And the king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat, "I will disguise myself and go into battle, but you wear your royal robes." So the king of Israel disguised himself and went into battle.
And the king of Israel said to Jehoshaphat
This refers to King Ahab of Israel, who was known for his idolatry and opposition to the prophets of God. Jehoshaphat was the king of Judah, a more faithful ruler who sought to follow the ways of the Lord. The alliance between Ahab and Jehoshaphat was politically motivated, as they were attempting to reclaim Ramoth-gilead from the Arameans. This partnership is significant because it shows the tension between political alliances and spiritual fidelity, a recurring theme in the history of Israel and Judah.

“I will disguise myself and go into battle
Ahab's decision to disguise himself reveals his fear and lack of trust in God's protection. This act of self-preservation contrasts with the typical role of a king, who would lead his troops visibly. The disguise can be seen as an attempt to avoid the prophecy of Micaiah, who foretold Ahab's downfall. This reflects a broader biblical theme where human attempts to thwart divine prophecy are ultimately futile.

but you wear your royal robes.”
Ahab's instruction to Jehoshaphat to wear his royal robes is a strategic move, possibly to draw enemy attention away from himself. This request places Jehoshaphat in a vulnerable position, highlighting Ahab's self-serving nature. The royal robes symbolize authority and leadership, and Jehoshaphat's compliance may indicate his trust in Ahab or a lack of awareness of the potential danger.

So the king of Israel disguised himself and went into battle.
Ahab's actions demonstrate a lack of faith and reliance on human cunning rather than divine guidance. His disguise is ultimately ineffective, as he is struck by a random arrow, fulfilling Micaiah's prophecy. This outcome underscores the biblical principle that God's will prevails despite human efforts to control or alter circumstances. The narrative serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of disobedience and the futility of opposing God's plans.

Persons / Places / Events
1. King of Israel (Ahab)
Ahab was the king of the northern kingdom of Israel, known for his idolatry and opposition to the prophets of God. In this passage, he seeks to disguise himself in battle.

2. Jehoshaphat
The king of Judah, known for his faithfulness to God. He allied with Ahab through marriage and joined him in battle against Ramoth-gilead.

3. Ramoth-gilead
A city of strategic importance, located in the territory of Gilead. It was the site of the battle where Ahab and Jehoshaphat fought against the Arameans.

4. Disguise
Ahab's decision to disguise himself reflects his fear and lack of trust in God's protection, contrasting with Jehoshaphat's openness.

5. Battle
The conflict against the Arameans, where Ahab's attempt to avoid his prophesied fate ultimately fails.
Teaching Points
The Futility of Human Schemes
Ahab's attempt to disguise himself demonstrates the futility of human efforts to escape God's sovereign will. No matter how clever our plans, they cannot thwart God's purposes.

The Importance of Trusting God
Jehoshaphat's willingness to wear his royal attire shows a level of trust in God's protection. Believers are called to trust in God's sovereignty rather than resorting to deceit or manipulation.

The Consequences of Unequal Alliances
Jehoshaphat's alliance with Ahab serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of forming alliances with those who do not share a commitment to God's ways. Such partnerships can lead to compromising situations.

God's Sovereignty in Judgment
Despite Ahab's efforts to avoid his prophesied death, God's judgment is ultimately fulfilled. This underscores the certainty of God's word and the inevitability of His justice.
Bible Study Questions
1. What does Ahab's decision to disguise himself reveal about his character and his relationship with God?

2. How does Jehoshaphat's response to Ahab's plan reflect his faith and trust in God? What can we learn from his example?

3. In what ways do we sometimes try to "disguise" ourselves or our intentions, and how does this reflect a lack of trust in God's sovereignty?

4. How can the account of Ahab and Jehoshaphat inform our decisions about forming alliances or partnerships in our own lives?

5. Reflect on a time when you tried to control an outcome contrary to God's will. What was the result, and what did you learn from that experience?
Connections to Other Scriptures
1 Kings 22
This chapter provides a parallel account of the events in 2 Chronicles 18, offering additional details about the prophecy of Micaiah and Ahab's fate.

Proverbs 21:30
This verse highlights the futility of human plans against God's will, which is evident in Ahab's attempt to disguise himself.

Psalm 33:10-11
These verses emphasize that the plans of the Lord stand firm forever, contrasting with Ahab's futile efforts to thwart God's prophecy.
Divine Truth and its Typical ReceptionJ. Wolfendale.2 Chronicles 18:4-34
The Battle of Ramoth. - an Ill-Fated ExpeditionT. Whitelaw 2 Chronicles 18:28-34
The True Lesson of Human IgnoranceW. Clarkson 2 Chronicles 18:28-34
People
Ahab, Amon, Aram, Chenaanah, Imla, Imlah, Jehoshaphat, Joash, Micah, Micaiah, Syrians, Zedekiah
Places
Jerusalem, Ramoth-gilead, Samaria, Syria
Topics
Battle, Change, Clothing, Disguise, Disguised, Disguiseth, Dress, Enter, Fight, Garments, Jehoshaphat, Jehosh'aphat, Myself, Robes, Royal, Seem, Wear
Dictionary of Bible Themes
2 Chronicles 18:29

     5177   robes

2 Chronicles 18:28-32

     5920   pretence

2 Chronicles 18:28-34

     5837   disguise

Library
That the Employing Of, and Associating with the Malignant Party, According as is Contained in the Public Resolutions, is Sinful and Unlawful.
That The Employing Of, And Associating With The Malignant Party, According As Is Contained In The Public Resolutions, Is Sinful And Unlawful. If there be in the land a malignant party of power and policy, and the exceptions contained in the Act of Levy do comprehend but few of that party, then there need be no more difficulty to prove, that the present public resolutions and proceedings do import an association and conjunction with a malignant party, than to gather a conclusion from clear premises.
Hugh Binning—The Works of the Rev. Hugh Binning

The Poor in Spirit are Enriched with a Kingdom
Theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:3 Here is high preferment for the saints. They shall be advanced to a kingdom. There are some who, aspiring after earthly greatness, talk of a temporal reign here, but then God's church on earth would not be militant but triumphant. But sure it is the saints shall reign in a glorious manner: Theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.' A kingdom is held the acme and top of all worldly felicity, and this honour have all the saints'; so says our Saviour, Theirs is the
Thomas Watson—The Beatitudes: An Exposition of Matthew 5:1-12

He Does Battle for the Faith; He Restores Peace among those who were at Variance; He Takes in Hand to Build a Stone Church.
57. (32). There was a certain clerk in Lismore whose life, as it is said, was good, but his faith not so. He was a man of some knowledge in his own eyes, and dared to say that in the Eucharist there is only a sacrament and not the fact[718] of the sacrament, that is, mere sanctification and not the truth of the Body. On this subject he was often addressed by Malachy in secret, but in vain; and finally he was called before a public assembly, the laity however being excluded, in order that if it were
H. J. Lawlor—St. Bernard of Clairvaux's Life of St. Malachy of Armagh

The Assyrian Revival and the Struggle for Syria
Assur-nazir-pal (885-860) and Shalmaneser III. (860-825)--The kingdom of Urartu and its conquering princes: Menuas and Argistis. Assyria was the first to reappear on the scene of action. Less hampered by an ancient past than Egypt and Chaldaea, she was the sooner able to recover her strength after any disastrous crisis, and to assume again the offensive along the whole of her frontier line. Image Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a bas-relief at Koyunjik of the time of Sennacherib. The initial cut,
G. Maspero—History Of Egypt, Chaldaea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, V 7

Chronicles
The comparative indifference with which Chronicles is regarded in modern times by all but professional scholars seems to have been shared by the ancient Jewish church. Though written by the same hand as wrote Ezra-Nehemiah, and forming, together with these books, a continuous history of Judah, it is placed after them in the Hebrew Bible, of which it forms the concluding book; and this no doubt points to the fact that it attained canonical distinction later than they. Nor is this unnatural. The book
John Edgar McFadyen—Introduction to the Old Testament

Links
2 Chronicles 18:29 NIV
2 Chronicles 18:29 NLT
2 Chronicles 18:29 ESV
2 Chronicles 18:29 NASB
2 Chronicles 18:29 KJV

2 Chronicles 18:29 Commentaries

Bible Hub
2 Chronicles 18:28
Top of Page
Top of Page