Why link God's favor to David's power?
1 Chronicles 14:2 – Why would God’s favor be linked to David’s increasing power and multiple wives, despite biblical warnings against polygamy elsewhere?

1. Context and Reading of 1 Chronicles 14:2

1 Chronicles 14:2 states: “And David realized that the LORD had established him as king over Israel and that his kingdom had been exalted for the sake of His people Israel.” This passage follows a description of David’s military victories and the consolidation of his reign. It also precedes a brief note about David taking multiple wives (1 Chronicles 14:3). At first glance, readers may wonder why the biblical text appears to link divine favor (“the LORD had established him as king”) with David’s growing power and the expansion of his household through additional marriages.

2. David’s Growing Power and Ancestral Roots

David’s rise to the throne of Israel was significant within the sweep of biblical history. He initially served as a shepherd (1 Samuel 16), then came to public attention through the defeat of Goliath (1 Samuel 17). Eventually, he inherited a unified kingdom after many trials and persecutions from King Saul (1 Samuel 18–31).

From an archaeological standpoint, the Tel Dan Stele (discovered in the 1990s) refers to the “House of David,” underscoring the historical reality of a Davidic dynasty. The biblical text and external evidence align to highlight that David’s rule was a genuine historical institution, not simply a literary construct.

God’s favor resting on David is consistently described as part of a wider covenant plan (2 Samuel 7:8–16). David’s victories—militarily and politically—were one facet of God’s providential work in Israel’s history. The kingdom’s establishment was not merely for David’s personal gain; the text specifically clarifies it was “for the sake of His people Israel” (1 Chronicles 14:2).

3. Polygamy in the Ancient Near East

The practice of polygamy was common in the Ancient Near East. Rulers often married multiple women to forge alliances, secure treaties, and demonstrate wealth and influence. Biblical narratives do not shy away from showing this cultural norm interwoven into the lives of figures such as Abraham (Genesis 16:1–4), Jacob (Genesis 29:21–30), and later kings, including David and Solomon (1 Kings 11:1–4).

However, the scriptural record frequently highlights the tensions and consequences of polygamy, including jealousy, bitterness, and family feud (e.g., Genesis 16:5–6; 29:31–30:24). In David’s own household, these tensions became evident in the discord among his sons, such as Absalom and Amnon (2 Samuel 13–18).

4. Biblical Warnings Against Polygamy

While David’s multiple marriages are described in the text, other biblical passages make it clear that polygamy was never God's ideal:

Genesis 2:24 declares, “For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.” From the beginning, the design was a monogamous union.

Deuteronomy 17:17 expressly warns future Israelite kings: “He must not take many wives for himself, lest his heart go astray…”.

• New Testament passages (e.g., Matthew 19:4–6, 1 Timothy 3:2) affirm the model of a man joining with one wife, reiterating God’s original design in Genesis.

The presence of polygamy in biblical accounts is part of the honest, unvarnished depiction of human failings—even among chosen leaders—rather than an endorsement of the practice.

5. Understanding God’s Favor in David’s Life

God’s favor toward David is rooted in a covenant relationship (2 Samuel 7:12–16). This favor was based on God’s gracious choice of David to lead Israel and ultimately pave the way for the Messiah (Matthew 1:1). When we read that “the LORD had established him as king,” we discern a theological explanation: David’s successes served God’s greater purposes, including unifying Israel and preparing a lineage from which Christ would come.

David’s growth in power and the expansion of his family do not necessarily signify God’s endorsement of polygamy. Rather, the biblical narrative often describes lives in all their complexities. God’s blessing and calling upon David stand in tension with David’s human shortcomings and sins (2 Samuel 11–12).

6. Consequences of Polygamy in David’s Story

Though God blessed David in many ways, the biblical text reveals that David’s polygamy bore negative fruit. Rivalry, distress, and sometimes outright rebellion arose within David’s own household:

• Amnon’s sin against Tamar and Absalom’s ensuing revenge (2 Samuel 13).

• Absalom’s subsequent rebellion against David, leading to civil conflict (2 Samuel 15–18).

These narratives communicate a lesson: while David held a unique status and divine appointment as Israel’s king, he still suffered consequences when deviating from God’s design. Scripture provides the report of history and God’s faithfulness amid human frailty, rather than silently glossing over moral failings.

7. Consistency of Scripture and God’s Purposes

Careful reading shows that the Bible never contradicts itself regarding God’s moral standards. The historical accounts of David’s polygamy are descriptive, not prescriptive. God had already given clear instructions that kings should not multiply wives. That David did so is evidence of human fallibility—yet it does not cancel the covenant promises that God chose to fulfill through David’s line.

Scripture’s consistency emerges through the overarching theme: God remains sovereign and works His redemptive plan even through imperfect individuals. At David’s best, his heart was devoted to God (1 Samuel 13:14), though he succumbed to certain cultural practices and personal weaknesses inconsistent with God’s perfect design.

8. Dealing with the Apparent Tension

Why, then, do we read 1 Chronicles 14:2 and see both God’s favor on David and mention of multiple wives in the same context?

1. God’s Redemptive Plan – The Chronicler underlines David’s favor because he is a significant figure in the lineage leading to the Messiah. The mention of multiple wives simply records the factual context in which David lived, not an endorsement of the practice.

2. Divinely Appointed Kingship – God established David’s rule for the benefit of Israel. David’s personal failings do not negate God’s faithfulness or purpose.

3. Moral Lessons – The narrative of David, in its entirety, teaches future generations that deviating from God’s design brings turmoil. This underlines that God’s will remains supreme, even as He engages with flawed people.

9. Practical Reflections and Lessons

Biblical accounts often provide cautionary examples. David’s story can serve as a reminder that leadership, success, and divine calling do not excuse transgressions that violate God’s standards. Polygamy, in David’s life, was a reflection of his cultural milieu and personal choices rather than a divine command.

Yet, we see that despite human failures, God continues His work. In our own lives, we may experience blessings or success, but these should not be misconstrued as approval for every choice we make. Genuine obedience and humility remain paramount (Psalm 51:17). Scripture teaches us that God’s grace extends to flawed individuals, touching hearts and refining us over time.

10. Conclusion

The passage in 1 Chronicles 14:2 showcases that the establishment of David’s kingdom was part of God’s gracious plan for Israel. The mention of David’s multiple wives (1 Chronicles 14:3) acknowledges personal and cultural practices that conflicted with the clear biblical ideal of monogamy. Rather than a contradiction, the text conveys a balance: God’s unwavering covenant purposes do not equate to His endorsement of every action that David took.

In viewing the entire Scriptural record, readers see that God is consistent in His moral standards. David’s polygamy brought eventual turmoil, just as the biblical warnings against polygamy had indicated. Nevertheless, the storyline remains one of divine favor upon David’s calling as king, setting the stage for the greater redemption that would come through the Messiah descended from David’s line.

God’s favor was linked to His covenant and design for the nation, not to David’s choice to multiply wives. The final takeaway is that the Creator works His sovereign plan through imperfect vessels, highlighting His mercy, faithfulness, and ultimate intention: that His people flourish under His loving rule.

Evidence of Hiram aiding David's palace?
Top of Page
Top of Page