Who was Moses' father-in-law? I. Introduction to the Question Moses’ father-in-law appears in several passages of the Hebrew Scriptures, primarily in the Book of Exodus. At first glance, the text presents multiple names—Reuel (or Raguel), Jethro, and Hobab—leading some readers to question whether there is a contradiction or confusion. However, close examination of the Berean Standard Bible and a broader understanding of ancient familial terminologies clarify the matter. Below is a comprehensive look at who Moses’ father-in-law was, why multiple names seem to appear, and how these references hold internal consistency according to Scripture. II. Key Scriptural References 1. Exodus 2:16–21: Moses flees from Egypt to Midian and encounters the daughters of the priest of Midian. Verse 18 refers to this Midianite priest as Reuel (Raguel in some translations). The text indicates that Moses stayed with him and ultimately married one of his daughters, Zipporah. 2. Exodus 3:1: Moses is shown tending the flock of his father-in-law, now introduced as Jethro, the priest of Midian. 3. Exodus 4:18: Moses returns to Jethro, his father-in-law, to request permission to go back to Egypt. Jethro grants his blessing. 4. Exodus 18:1–12: Jethro visits Moses in the wilderness after the Exodus from Egypt. This important scene mentions him repeatedly as “Moses’ father-in-law” and underscores his role as a guiding figure who offers wise counsel. 5. Numbers 10:29: A reference to Hobab, who is called the son of Reuel the Midianite, Moses’ father-in-law. This indicates a family relationship that includes Jethro as well, leading to varied interpretations. III. Reconciling the Names (Reuel, Jethro, Hobab) 1. Reuel (Raguel) as the Patriarchal Name: Some interpret “Reuel” as the broader family or clan head (the priestly line in Midian). Exodus 2:18 states, “When they returned to their father Reuel...”. Thus, Reuel could have been the patriarch of Moses’ wife’s family, making him a fatherly figure within the household. 2. Jethro as an Honorific Title or Personal Name: Many biblical scholars hold that Jethro is an individual name or an honorific title meaning something akin to “excellence” or “abundance.” This name is used more frequently in Exodus chapters 3, 4, and 18 when describing Moses’ father-in-law’s interactions and his role as priest of Midian. It is possible Jethro and Reuel are the same person, one name being a personal name and the other a title or alternate name. 3. Hobab as a Son or Another In-Law: Hobab is introduced in Numbers 10:29 as “the son of Reuel the Midianite, Moses’ father-in-law”. This reference leads to the interpretation that Hobab could be either: - Moses’ brother-in-law (the son of Reuel, and thus also related to Jethro if Jethro and Reuel are indeed the same individual) - Or a different relative considered part of Moses’ general in-law family, given that ancient Hebrew terms for “in-law” often encompassed extended relationships. Collectively, these references do not show contradiction; instead, they represent standard ancient Near Eastern naming practices, where prominent patriarchs and heads of clans often held more than one name or title, and the term “father-in-law” could apply to multiple male relatives of a wife, including patriarchs, uncles, or older brothers. IV. The Midianite Context and Priesthood Moses meets his in-laws in Midian, a geographically significant region often associated with trade routes. From an archaeological vantage point, Midian is placed east of the Sinai Peninsula stretching into northwestern Arabia. Historical records indicate the Midianites had their own culture and worship practices, though they were likely familiar with worship of Yahweh predating the formal giving of the Law (compare with Genesis 25:1–2 for Midian’s ancestral line from Abraham). The fact that Jethro/Reuel was a recognized “priest of Midian” (Exodus 3:1) underscores his respected status in the community. Moses’ years in Midian not only provided refuge from Pharaoh but also an environment where Moses matured in responsibilities—tending flocks, leading a family, and receiving instruction that would later serve him in leading the nation of Israel. V. Moses’ Father-in-Law’s Role in Leadership In Exodus 18, Jethro’s counsel to Moses regarding leadership structure shows how he impacted Moses significantly: • Exodus 18:17–23: Jethro observes Moses handling the people’s disputes alone and advises him to delegate duties to capable men to prevent exhaustion. This practical wisdom helps Moses efficiently guide the Israelites. • Jethro’s advice sets an early governmental precedent, often referenced in discussions of shared leadership and healthy organizational oversight. VI. Significance in Biblical Narrative Moses’ father-in-law, whether termed Jethro or Reuel, exemplifies a figure of spiritual and practical authority. He influences Moses spiritually by affirming the work of the God of Israel (Exodus 18:10–12) and offering insights for daily governance. The narrative illustrates that God can use individuals outside the immediate covenant community (as Midianites were not Israelites) to further God’s redemptive plan. It underlines the truth that all creation can bear witness to the One who designed and governs the universe. VII. Textual and Manuscript Consistency Biblical manuscripts that mention these various names (e.g., the Masoretic Text of Exodus) maintain overall coherence in describing this father-in-law relationship. Ancient Hebrew often employed terms such as ḥātān (חָתָן, “relative by marriage”), which can denote different relations. The references to Reuel, Jethro, and Hobab are best understood in this linguistic backdrop. Early church fathers and traditional Jewish commentators similarly recognized the multi-name dynamic. None viewed the chatan references as contradictions but rather as a reflection of normal naming conventions in those eras. VIII. Common Questions Addressed 1. Is there a contradiction in the biblical text regarding Moses’ father-in-law? No. The different names point to either titles or extended family members. Ancient familial terms and naming practices readily account for these variations. 2. Could Jethro and Reuel have been different individuals? Some argue Reuel was the older head of the family (Moses’ wife’s grandfather), and Jethro was her father. Others suggest Jethro was simply another name or title for Reuel. The context does not indicate internal discrepancy. 3. Why is the father-in-law called a “priest of Midian”? He served a religious role in Midian—either as a tribal or clan priest, recognized for spiritual leadership. This neither undermines Moses’ calling nor the uniqueness of Israel’s eventual covenant, but it shows God can reveal His purposes even to those outside the direct lineage of Israel. IX. Conclusion Moses’ father-in-law, most often called Jethro, also identified as Reuel, stands as a vital figure in the life of Moses. Far from a contradiction, the scriptural narrative of Exodus uses multiple identifiers to describe the same man or family line. Jethro/Reuel/Hobab’s role as a supportive advisor and spiritual guide highlights the broader biblical theme of God’s sovereignty over all nations and peoples. Through this figure, Scripture demonstrates continuity in the message of redemption and leadership among God’s people. The text invites deeper reflection on how God, the Creator of the universe, orchestrates history through individuals of diverse backgrounds to establish His covenant and guide His people according to His eternal design. |
    |