How do Daniel and Belteshazzar differ? Introduction Daniel is one of the most prominent figures in the Old Testament, known for his unwavering devotion to God and his remarkable ability to interpret dreams. Surprisingly, this same Daniel was also called “Belteshazzar.” Despite being the same person, each name carries distinct nuances. The following entry explores the significance, usage, and differing contexts of “Daniel” and “Belteshazzar” in the Scriptures. 1. The Hebrew Name: Daniel Daniel’s Hebrew name (דָּנִיֵּאל, Daniyel) literally means “God is my judge.” This name underscores Daniel’s heritage from the kingdom of Judah and highlights his faithfulness to the God of Israel. In the Book of Daniel, one sees Daniel’s Hebrew identity through his consistent practice of prayer, dietary convictions, and spiritual devotion. Even when transported to Babylon, he remains steadfast in recognizing Yahweh as the one true Judge. Notably, Daniel 1:6–7 introduces Daniel before referencing his Babylonian name. Daniel’s role in the Babylonian court reveals his resolute faith. Passages like Daniel 6:10 show him continuing his practice of praying three times a day to the Lord, despite any fear of punishment. His Hebrew name, and the faith it represents, remains a crucial reminder of God’s sovereignty over his life. 2. The Babylonian Name: Belteshazzar Upon Daniel’s exile to Babylon, the chief official gave him the Babylonian name Belteshazzar (בֵּלְטְשַׁאצַּר). According to Daniel 1:7: “The chief official gave them new names: to Daniel he gave the name Belteshazzar…” The meaning often suggested for this Babylonian name is “Bel protect the king” or “Bel protect his life,” referencing a Babylonian deity. This name change was part of the wider Babylonian practice of reshaping the cultural and religious identity of captives. Officials hoped to integrate talented young men (like Daniel) into Babylonian society by bestowing names that honored Babylonian gods rather than the God of Israel. Still, the biblical narrative shows that despite the name Belteshazzar, Daniel’s heart and allegiance remained with Yahweh. In Daniel 4:8, Nebuchadnezzar refers to him as “Belteshazzar, after the name of my god,” yet also notes that “the Spirit of the holy gods is in him.” This illustrates the contrast between Daniel’s outward association with Babylonian culture and his inner, unshakable dedication to the God of Israel. 3. Their Usage in the Book of Daniel Although Daniel and Belteshazzar refer to the same individual, the name “Daniel” is employed more frequently when the biblical text focuses on his personal faith in God, his visions, his prayers, and his prophecies. By contrast, the name “Belteshazzar” appears in official Babylonian court contexts. It is often used by Babylonian kings or officials—figures who recognized him within the empire’s structures. For instance, in Daniel 5:12, King Belshazzar’s mother calls upon “Daniel (whom the king named Belteshazzar)” to interpret writing on the wall. Here the dual reference emphasizes both Daniel’s Hebrew and Babylonian designations to clarify who he is. 4. Significance of the Dual Identity The dual identification symbolizes Daniel’s remarkable life in two worlds: the Babylonian empire and the kingdom of God. Though living in a foreign land with a Babylonian name, his loyalty to the God of his forefathers was never diminished. This dual identity serves as an example of faithfulness under cultural pressure. Despite a name reflecting Babylonian religion and an imperial environment urging conformity, Daniel’s reliance on the God of Israel never wavers. His faithfulness (even under threat of death) holds great importance for understanding his personal identity and God’s sustaining power. 5. Comparison and Contrast 1. Name Origin: • Daniel: Hebrew, meaning “God is my judge.” • Belteshazzar: Babylonian, honoring a Babylonian deity. 2. Spiritual Emphasis: • Daniel: Highlights covenant faithfulness with the God of Israel. • Belteshazzar: Reflects the Babylonian attempt to recontextualize Daniel’s identity under the gods of Babylon. 3. Contextual Usage: • “Daniel” is used heavily in the narrative’s focus on prophecy and personal devotion. • “Belteshazzar” is used primarily in Babylonian court settings and official announcements. 4. Cultural Pressure: • The Hebrew name is linked to worshiping Yahweh and obeying God’s law. • The Babylonian name attempted to assimilate Daniel, yet did not change his allegiance or actions. Through this juxtaposition, the reader sees Daniel’s steadfast perseverance, godly wisdom, and humility in a hostile environment. 6. Insights into God’s Sovereignty In the broader narrative, the transformation from Daniel to Belteshazzar (and the continued usage of both names) underscores God’s overarching sovereignty. Even when subjected to imperial forces, Daniel—often by his Hebrew name—receives visions and revelations proving God’s dominion over human kingdoms. In Daniel 2 and 4, for instance, the interpretation of dreams shows the power of God transcending any human authority. Indeed, in Daniel 4:34–35, Nebuchadnezzar (who knew Daniel as Belteshazzar) ultimately praises the “King of heaven.” Remarkably, the God of Israel works through Daniel’s life, bridging kingdoms and declaring His power as the ruler of all creation. 7. Practical Applications for Readers • Identity in God: Daniel’s story reminds readers that no matter what name or label culture imposes, one’s true identity is rooted in God’s calling and grace. • Faith Under Pressure: The account of Daniel emphasizes staying faithful under cultural demands that oppose one’s convictions. • Witness to the Nations: Daniel’s wisdom and integrity offered a powerful witness about God’s character, even among those who worshiped other gods. Conclusion Daniel and Belteshazzar are not two separate individuals; rather, “Belteshazzar” was the Babylonian name given to Daniel. While these names differ in origin, in meaning, and in the setting where each is used, they both point to the same person: a faithful servant of God who, despite living in a foreign land under a pagan name, never abandoned his devotion to the Lord. This dual naming affirms that the God of Israel remains sovereign over every person, culture, and kingdom. Daniel’s unwavering fidelity serves as a continuing testament to believers and non-believers alike, illustrating that the God who rescued Daniel is alive and at work even now. |
    |