Matthew 10:8 – Do we have any historical or archaeological evidence confirming that the apostles actually performed miracles such as raising the dead? Historical Context of Matthew 10:8 Matthew 10:8 states, “Heal the sick, raise the dead, cleanse the lepers, drive out demons. Freely you have received; freely give.” This directive was given by Jesus to His apostles. The question arises whether there is any historical or archaeological verification that these men performed such miracles, specifically raising the dead. The historical context places the apostles traveling throughout Judea, Samaria, and beyond, proclaiming the message entrusted to them. Written sources from the 1st century through the early 4th century represent the primary evidence for their ministries and include the canonical New Testament texts as well as writings of early church leaders. While physical archaeological “proof” of a resurrection event is not something we would typically expect (because it is not the kind of event that leaves direct material traces like an inscription or coin), textual records and corroborative details in related archaeological finds help shed light on the reliability of these miracle claims. Documented Apostolic Miracles in the New Testament Acts 9:36–42 (Raising of Tabitha) One of the most direct New Testament passages describing an apostle raising someone from the dead is found in Acts 9:36–42. Peter is called to the body of a beloved disciple named Tabitha (also known as Dorcas) who had passed away. Peter prays, then says: “But Peter sent them all outside, and he knelt down and prayed. Turning to the body, he said, ‘Tabitha, get up!’ She opened her eyes, and when she saw Peter, she sat up.” (Acts 9:40) This account specifies that many were present to witness this event, leading to further spread of the gospel (Acts 9:42). As part of the Book of Acts, which repeatedly demonstrates close attention to historical detail (e.g., the names of officials, cities, geographical routes), this narrative is included among other well-corroborated occurrences. Acts 20:7–12 (Raising of Eutychus) Another example is found in Acts 20:7–12. While Paul is preaching, a young man named Eutychus falls from a third-floor window and is presumed dead. Paul goes to him, embraces him, and presents him alive: “Seated in a window was a young man named Eutychus, who was sinking into a deep sleep… But Paul went down, threw himself on the young man, and embraced him. ‘Do not be alarmed,’ he said, ‘He is still alive!’” (Acts 20:9–10) The passage is written as a firsthand historical report (commonly attributed to Luke, a detailed historian who accompanied Paul). It includes specific personal names and a distinct location (Troas), giving it a verifiable context. Early Church Fathers’ Testimonies Clement of Rome (1st Century AD) Though Clement of Rome’s first letter to the Corinthians (c. AD 95–97) primarily addresses unity and church discipline, it confirms the zeal and sacrifice of the apostles and how their message was attended by signs. Clement does not detail a resurrection miracle performed by the apostles themselves, but he confirms a strong early tradition about apostolic authority and miracles in general. Eusebius of Caesarea (Early 4th Century AD) Eusebius, in his “Ecclesiastical History,” meticulously recorded traditions passed down about the apostles. He cites earlier sources (many no longer extant) that attest to the spread of Christianity through miraculous signs. While not offering a direct “archaeological artifact,” Eusebius’s collection of documents from earlier times underscores that believers from the 1st and 2nd centuries took these miracle accounts seriously and treated them as historic fact. Irenaeus (2nd Century AD) In “Against Heresies,” Irenaeus (writing near the end of the 2nd century) repeatedly mentions the apostles as miracle workers, empowered by the Holy Spirit. Though he focuses more on doctrinal issues against Gnosticism, he attributes undeniable miracles to the apostolic age, relayed through Christians just a few generations removed from the apostles themselves. Archaeological and Historical Corroboration Validation of the Book of Acts Archaeological studies corroborate the accuracy of many local details in the Book of Acts. Classical scholar and historian Colin Hemer enumerated numerous points of historical precision—cities, cultural practices, government titles, and traveling conditions—that indicate Acts was based on accurate eyewitness accounts. The existence of such precision in other areas of Acts lends credibility to its account of miracles, including reported resurrections. Early Christian Sites and Artifacts Early Christian artifacts, such as inscriptions and meeting places in catacombs, confirm rapid growth of Christian communities that revered the apostles. While these artifacts do not say, “Here is physical proof of raising the dead,” they do show how significantly the stories of miracles impacted early Christian worship and identity. Consistent references to miraculous healings and wonders, including raising of the dead, appear in artwork (e.g., catacomb frescoes) depicting biblical scenes, reflecting what believers accepted as historically true. Manuscript Evidence Multiple New Testament manuscripts date back to within a century (or less) of the original writings. Fragments such as Papyrus 52 (Rylands Library Papyrus) from the Gospel of John and other early copies attest that believers were spreading reports of miracles at a time contemporaneous with living witnesses. The closeness of these manuscripts to the events reduces the likelihood that tall tales could supplant genuine, shared knowledge in a community that could verify or refute extraordinary claims. Considerations From Outside Sources Non-Christian Acknowledgments of Christian Miracles Some non-Christian ancient writers noted the extraordinary claims of believers. While they do not confirm raising the dead, they frequently comment on the “magical” or supernatural nature of Christian practices. Even the skepticism or hostile narratives of certain Roman historians highlight the widespread belief that Christians conducted inexplicable healing and supernatural works. Josephus and Tacitus Josephus (1st century AD) and Tacitus (2nd century AD) do not explicitly mention the raising of the dead by the apostles, but they do confirm key historical points: Jesus was crucified, Christianity spread rapidly, and the new sect believed in spectacular occurrences. This rapid growth and unwavering devotion, under persecution, suggest that these early believers were convinced of miraculous power in their community. Philosophical and Behavioral Perspectives Reports of the apostles raising the dead must be evaluated within a worldview that allows for miracles. In a purely naturalistic worldview, any such claim will be dismissed by default. However, in the historical-theistic framework, consistent with the entire biblical narrative of God’s intervention, miracles are regarded as extraordinary but possible actions of a sovereign Creator. The behavior of the apostles and early Christians—exemplified by willingness to suffer torture and execution—offers indirect evidence that they themselves believed deeply in the miraculous nature of their mission. Disillusioned or fraudulent individuals are less likely to persist through hostility and personal danger. This steadfast commitment is often cited as a powerful indirect corroboration for the authenticity of miracles they reported. Summary and Conclusion While ancient history seldom provides the kind of “on-site artifact” confirming a resurrection miracle, the recorded accounts in Acts (especially Acts 9 and Acts 20), the corroborative nature of archaeological evidence supporting the Book of Acts as historically reliable, and the consistent testimony of early church sources all converge to support the credibility of apostolic miracles. Matthew 10:8 gave the apostles a divine commission to demonstrate the power of God through healing, casting out demons, and even raising the dead. New Testament passages assert that such miraculous works occurred, and early Christian communities firmly believed these accounts. Nothing in the preserved literature—whether from Christian writers or cautious critics—provides any solid ground for dismissing the unanimous tradition pointing to genuine apostolic miracles. Instead, historical data and textual transmission of Scripture present a coherent case that the apostles did indeed perform miraculous signs consistent with Christ’s instructions, including the raising of the dead. |
    |