Revelation 21:15-17 And he that talked with me had a golden reed to measure the city, and the gates thereof, and the wall thereof.… The book of the Revelation is full of contrasts: — e.g., Michael and the dragon; the woman clothed with the sun, and the woman clothed in scarlet; the beast and his mark, and the Lamb and His mark. One might almost re-arrange the contents in a series of contrasts or antitheses, culminating in the great antithesis of Babylon and the New Jerusalem. I. THE APPEARANCE OF THE TWO CITIES. Both lie foursquare, but — In Babylon there are no natural heights; such heights as there are, are artificial, and barely rise to the level of the walls. In the New Jerusalem, on the other hand, the height and the length and the breadth are equal. Surely this well represents the difference which exists between the world and the Church. Worldly ambition can, at most, rear for itself some mound of fame; the saints progress by an upward pathway which winds towards the summit of the holy mountain. "Ye are come unto Mount Zion." II. THE RIVERS WHICH WATER THE TWO CITIES. Babylon was watered by the Euphrates, of which the source lay without the walls. The city was taken through this radical defect; the invaders, altering the course of the river, entered secretly along the river-bed. In the New Jerusalem the river of the water of life has its source in the midst of the city, flowing out from beneath the throne, which occupies its midmost summit. In either case the river is a type of health and happiness. The pleasures of the world, however, are never safe from pollution at the source. Disease and death may taint them at any time, or draw the stream into other channels. But "there is a river, the streams whereof make glad the city of God," and that river has its source protected; it confers pleasure "for evermore," because it is sheltered by His right hand. III. THE COMPARATIVE SIZE OF THE TWO CITIES. Babylon was a "great city" — about three times the size of London. Yet, comparing the measurements which Herodotus gives of Babylon with those which St. John gives of the New Jerusalem, we find that the latter would contain just 10,000 of the former. The world has great influence, and the cause is adequate to the effect; yet how comparatively insignificant it is when we contrast its pretensions with the greatness of God's Church! IV. THE GATES AND STREETS OF THE TWO CITIES. Babylon here seems to have the advantage — one hundred gates instead of twelve. The advantage, however, is only apparent, and serves to illustrate its real deficiencies. For observe — Babylon is built on a plain, with twenty-five gates on each side, and streets running from gate to gate; its ground-plan forms a series of squares held together by the limiting square of the walls. The New Jerusalem is built on a hill. The city is pyramidal in form; all the streets run up towards the summit, and meet in the vicinity of the throne. The world is held together by restraint; its elements have all a pseudo independence; its motto is, "Each for himself." It has no true principle of unity. In the Church, on the other hand, there is a centre of attraction. "The throne of God and of the Lamb" gives to the whole an organic unity. Its members may approach from different sides, but all of necessity approach the centre. Their motto is, "Thy will be done"; in dependence on that will they are united. (C. A. Goodhart, M. A.) Parallel Verses KJV: And he that talked with me had a golden reed to measure the city, and the gates thereof, and the wall thereof. |
    |