Who is the author of the Book of Ruth? Authorship of the Book of Ruth Overview The Book of Ruth is set “in the days when the judges ruled” (Ruth 1:1), describing the journey of Naomi and her Moabite daughter-in-law, Ruth, through hardship and into a blessed lineage. The narrative concludes with a genealogy that culminates in King David (Ruth 4:17–22). Although the text does not explicitly name its author, careful evaluation of internal and external evidence—such as literary features, historical context, and ancient Jewish tradition—helps guide discussions regarding who wrote this engaging account. Scriptural Clues from Ruth Ruth 1:1 sets the historical context: “In the days when the judges ruled, there was a famine in the land…”. This background suggests an era prior to Israel’s monarchy, though the closing genealogy points to King David’s lineage (Ruth 4:17–22). There is no direct statement, however, identifying the author by name. The extended family line that ends in David signals that the writer (or final compiler) had knowledge of David’s significance, indicating a date of composition sometime after David’s rise to prominence. Nevertheless, the text consistently upholds ancient Israelite customs—from gleaning the fields (Ruth 2:2–7) to the practice of kinsman-redeemer (Ruth 2:20; 4:1–10)—without suggesting a later anachronistic perspective. These scriptural references to well-established norms support an earlier date within or near the time of David’s reign. Jewish Tradition and Talmudic Insights Within Jewish tradition, a common attribution is that the Book of Ruth was authored by the prophet Samuel. The ancient Talmud (Bava Batra 14b–15a) assigns portions of biblical writing to Samuel based on the timeline in which he served as prophet and judge. This tradition holds that Samuel authored Judges, Ruth, and the initial chapters of 1 Samuel, with later prophets completing what he did not finish. While this tradition is not universally accepted in modern scholarship, it provides a historical witness that early Jewish interpreters valued and preserved. Because the Talmud’s testimony is close to the time in which the Hebrew texts were canonized as sacred Scripture, it carries a measure of weight in discussions of authorship. Literary and Theological Context The Book of Ruth features a literary style consistent with historical narrative, incorporating dialogue and cultural details that reflect a rural Israelite setting. Though concise, it weaves a theology of providence, loyalty, and redemption. Its portrayal of Bethlehem (Ruth 1:19; 2:4) complements the broader lineage significance, as Bethlehem becomes intricately connected with the Davidic line and, eventually, the promised Messiah (cf. Micah 5:2). Archaeological discoveries in the region of Bethlehem confirm the settlement’s long history, supporting the historical veracity of the setting described. Ancient farming practices, gleaning rituals, and legal customs regarding land and inheritance also find parallels in other Old Testament passages (cf. Leviticus 19:9–10), reinforcing the cultural authenticity of the narrative. Potential Attribution to Samuel Supporters of Samuel’s authorship point out that he would have lived near the conclusion of the time of the judges and prior to the full establishment of David’s monarchy. This would place him in an ideal position to compile or write a historical account leading up to the introduction of David’s royal lineage. Additionally, conservative dating of the Book of Ruth suggests that it was composed prior to or just at the beginning of David’s reign, making Samuel’s lifetime (approximately late 11th century BC) a plausible period for authorship. While the Book of Ruth’s final genealogical note includes David, it is conceivable that a later prophet or scribe appended the closing verses after Samuel’s original composition. Alternative Perspectives Some scholars argue for a post-exilic date, pointing to supposed linguistic features and thematic emphases that might indicate a later period for theological reflection on Israel’s heritage. However, many of these linguistic observations can be explained by regional dialects and literary styles prevalent in earlier eras. In addition, the genealogical emphasis on David is not unique to post-exilic historiography, as genealogies were used throughout Israel’s history to authenticate family lines and covenant inheritance. Significance of the Author’s Identity Whether Samuel was the direct author or the Book of Ruth arose from an unknown writer closely acquainted with Israel’s transition from the time of the judges, the core message remains unaffected. The book demonstrates faithfulness and God’s providential care. It also lays the groundwork for David’s royal line, which is central to the Hebrew Scriptures and ultimately culminates in the New Testament’s direct mention of Ruth (Matthew 1:5) within the lineage of the Messiah. Because the Book of Ruth holds an unbroken place in the canonical tradition, no contradiction arises from varied views on authorship. The central figure remains the living God upholding His covenant promises—even through the loyal actions of a foreigner like Ruth, whose faith and example lead to a redemptive heritage for all who look to God’s saving plan. Conclusion The traditional view, supported by Jewish tradition, ascribes authorship of the Book of Ruth to the prophet Samuel. This attribution aligns well with internal literary clues, historical context, and the genealogical conclusion referencing King David. While certainty may be elusive in the absence of specific internal claims, the text’s unity, cultural authenticity, and seamless inclusion in both ancient Jewish and Christian Scripture give ample reasons to accept a reputable early authorship. In every scenario, the Book of Ruth stands as a testimony to enduring faith, covenant fidelity, and divine purpose. The final genealogy culminating in David highlights an ongoing promise that reverberates through the entire biblical narrative, underscoring how a humble family story from Bethlehem has far-reaching significance across time and into the redemptive plan revealed throughout Scripture. |
    |