Which is it: cross, pole, or stake? I. Introduction to the Question The question “Which is it: cross, pole, or stake?” arises because certain texts and religious groups have claimed that the instrument of Jesus’ execution might have been a single upright post or stake, whereas others maintain that it was a cross with a transverse beam. This entry will explore the scriptural language, historical usage, archaeological evidence, and early Christian writings to provide a comprehensive answer. II. Scriptural Terminology Among the central points of discussion are the ancient Greek terms used in the New Testament: 1. Stauros (σταυρός): Commonly translated as “cross” in many English versions. Historically, the primary meaning of stauros stems from “an upright stake.” However, by the time of the Roman Empire, the term often referred to various shaped executions structures used by Roman authorities, including those with crossbeams. 2. Xylon (ξύλον): Often rendered “tree” or “wood.” In some passages referring to crucifixion (e.g., Acts 5:30; 1 Peter 2:24), this word can mean “wooden apparatus” and at times is used interchangeably in connection with stauros. The usage does not necessarily exclude a crossbeam but rather emphasizes the wooden nature of the instrument. A relevant biblical example is John 19:19: “Pilate also had a notice written and fastened to the cross.” The Greek for “cross” here is stauros, reflecting an execution instrument recognized as more than a simple pole. III. Historical and Cultural Context 1. Roman Method of Crucifixion: By the first century, the Romans employed crucifixion to punish criminals and instill fear. Historical sources, including writings by Josephus and Tacitus, show that crucifixion often involved a vertical stake and a horizontal crossbeam (patibulum). Victims typically carried the crossbeam to the place of execution, where it was affixed to an upright post. 2. Shape Variations: The Romans did not use a single uniform shape for all executions; some could have resembled a simple “T” shape (the Tau cross), while the Latin cross shape (“†”) was also common. Despite variations, the presence of a crossbeam is well testified among ancient records. 3. Archaeological Evidence: - A first-century crucifixion victim’s remains discovered near Jerusalem in 1968 revealed that nails were driven through the heels, and there is some inference of a cross-like structure. Although the full device itself was not preserved, this find provides strong evidence of Roman crucifixion practices in Judea. - Early Christian artwork and inscriptions from the first few centuries often depict a cross shape or references to a crossbeam. IV. Early Church Writings and Symbols 1. Epistle of Barnabas (Late 1st or Early 2nd Century): This writing makes an allegorical link between the cross and the letter “T,” suggesting a cross-like shape rather than merely a vertical stake. 2. Justin Martyr (2nd Century): References to the cross in his Apologies and Dialogues. Justin explicitly connects the device of Christ’s death with a cross structure, consistent with the recognizable symbol of Christianity even then. 3. Tertullian (Late 2nd to Early 3rd Century): In his works, Tertullian uses language consistent with a cross (crux in Latin) bearing a crossbeam. 4. Early Christian Symbols: The signing of the cross and depictions in catacombs confirm that the concept of a cross with a crossbeam was embedded in Christian worship and identity from an early date. V. Linguistic Analysis and Manuscript Evidence 1. Greek Usage Evolution: While classical Greek literature might use stauros to indicate an upright stake, the meaning adapted when describing Roman crucifixion practices. Scholarly analyses of first-century usage indicate that stauros could signify a structure that included a crossbeam. 2. Consistency in Biblical Manuscripts: Ancient manuscripts, such as Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, preserve references to stauros with no suggestion of a mere stake. The textual tradition shows remarkable consistency in referring to the instrument of Jesus’ death as a stauros, which mainstream Greek usage by that time included as a “cross.” 3. Multiple Nails: John 20:25 recounts the disciple Thomas saying, “Unless I see in His hands the mark of the nails…” The plural usage of “nails” (in the Greek text as well) aligns more naturally with a structure that would require separate nails in each hand or wrist, often consistent with the common depiction of a crossbeam. VI. Theological Significance Regardless of the exact shape—whether strictly pole-like or cross-shaped—Scripture consistently portrays that Christ’s atoning sacrifice took place upon a Roman execution device. However, the broader historical context and the available archaeological and linguistic data weigh heavily in favor of a cross with a transverse beam. What is most essential in the biblical narrative is the theological meaning: Christ’s death—accomplishing salvation for believers—occurred through a public, humiliating Roman execution. Thus, while the shape itself is of historical and doctrinal interest, Scripture’s focus remains on the significance of His sacrificial act and subsequent resurrection. VII. Reasons Cross Is the Preferred Translation 1. Roman Execution Customs: Dominant practice involved a crossbeam attached to an upright post. 2. First-Century Language Shift: Stauros was widely used to signify these cross-shaped devices in the Roman Empire. 3. Early Church Fathers: Consistently identified His execution device as a cross in their expositions. 4. Symbolic Recognition: Artwork, inscriptions, and Christian practice from the earliest centuries centered on the cross as the execution instrument. 5. Biblical Clues: The use of multiple nails and references to a sign posted “above His head” (e.g., Matthew 27:37) supports a crossbeam. VIII. Conclusion The best-supported conclusion, aligned with scriptural terminology in its historical context, early Christian testimony, and archaeological indications, is that the device of Jesus’ crucifixion was indeed a cross, rather than a simple vertical pole or stake. While variations in Roman execution devices existed, the extensive evidence—from linguistic usage of stauros during this era to early Christian writings and symbolic practices—confirms that the “cross” is the most accurate translation and historical reality. End of Entry. |
    |