What are emerods in the Bible?
What are emerods in the Bible?

Definition and Etymology

“Emerods” is the older English term found in some historical Bible translations (notably the King James Version) to describe painful swellings inflicted upon the Philistines in 1 Samuel 5 and 6. Modern translations such as the Berean Standard Bible most often render the term as “tumors,” reflecting the probable meaning of the underlying Hebrew word. While the exact medical identification remains a point of scholarly discussion, these growths or swellings were clearly regarded as a severe affliction and understood as divine judgment.


Biblical Context

The primary passages concerning emerods (tumors) appear in 1 Samuel 5–6, describing how the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant and brought it into the temple of their deity Dagon. Scripture recounts the ensuing calamities as follows:

1 Samuel 5:6: “Now the hand of the LORD was heavy on the people of Ashdod, and He terrified and afflicted them with tumors—both Ashdod and its territory.”

1 Samuel 5:9: “But after they had moved it, the hand of the LORD was against the city, causing great panic. He afflicted the men of that city, young and old, with an outbreak of tumors.”

1 Samuel 5:12: “Those who did not die were afflicted with tumors, and the outcry of the city went up to heaven.”

Realizing the seriousness of their predicament, the Philistines decided to move the Ark from one city to another, but the affliction followed them. Ultimately, the Philistine rulers concluded they must return the Ark to Israel along with a guilt offering:

1 Samuel 6:4–5: “What guilt offering should we send back to Him? asked the Philistines. Five gold tumors and five gold rats... Make images of your tumors and of the rats that are destroying the land...”

This guilt offering of golden images symbolized both the physical affliction (tumors) and another accompanying problem (rats), demonstrating the Philistines’ desperate attempt to appease the God of Israel.


Possible Medical Explanations

Various theories have been proposed to identify the nature of these “tumors”:

1. Hemorrhoids: Some scholars suggest that “emerods” were literal hemorrhoids—painful swellings in a sensitive area—based on the wording of older English versions and certain Hebrew interpretations.

2. Bubonic Plague: Others argue that references to rats infesting the land (1 Samuel 6:5) may point to a form of plague transmitted by rodents. The Bible mentions the destruction of the land by rats, suggesting a larger contagion at work.

3. Other Forms of Tumors: Still others hold that these were simply painful growths on the skin, possibly akin to boils or severe swellings, rather than a specific known modern illness.

The biblical narrative does not provide a precise medical description, which is unsurprising given the ancient context. Nevertheless, whatever the affliction was in modern medical terms, the critical message is that these tumors were widely recognized as a divine punishment.


Historical and Cultural Significance

Archaeological surveys and excavations at sites such as Ashdod, Ashkelon, and Ekron (major Philistine cities) have uncovered remains dating to the Iron Age—an archaeological period consistent with the biblical timeline. These ruins corroborate cultural details presented in Scripture, such as distinct Philistine influences on pottery and architecture.

Additionally, extra-biblical records from surrounding nations testify to conflicts between Israelites and Philistines, reinforcing the historicity of these power struggles. Although these ancient sources may not specifically reference the episode of emerods, the broader archaeological and historical framework aligns well with the biblical account in 1 Samuel.


Theological Lessons

1. Divine Sovereignty: The account demonstrates that God’s power extends beyond geographic boundaries. Even in Philistine territory, the Lord defends His honor and shows He cannot be treated as a mere trophy of war.

2. Holiness of the Ark: The Ark of the Covenant was no ordinary object. Handling it irreverently resulted in severe consequences. This underscores the reverence owed to the presence and commands of God throughout Scripture.

3. Need for Reverence and Repentance: Although the Philistines sought to placate God by returning the Ark and offering golden images of their tumors and rats, genuine repentance would involve recognizing the LORD’s authority. Their response, though partially correct, was influenced more by desperate fear than by heartfelt submission.

4. God’s Covenant with Israel: This incident exemplifies the protective aspect of God’s covenant. Though the Israelites had sinned (leading to the Ark’s capture), the Lord remained faithful to His people, using this event to demonstrate His might.


Use in Later Biblical Discussions

While “emerods” (tumors) appear most prominently in the Philistine narrative, the wider principle of divine judgment and mercy persists throughout Scripture. God’s intervention can manifest in surprising ways, whether blessings or afflictions, directing His people and outsiders to acknowledge Him. In the New Testament, ultimate redemption and wholeness come through faith in Christ’s atoning work, shifting the emphasis from physical retribution to eternal salvation (cf. Romans 6:23).


Conclusion

“Emerods” in the Bible refer to the painful tumors inflicted on the Philistines as part of God’s judgment after their capture of the Ark of the Covenant. The Philistines’ experience underscores the exceptional holiness of God and the seriousness of coming into contact with what He has set apart.

Although the exact medical diagnosis may remain uncertain, the biblical text leaves no ambiguity about the intent and outcome: God defended His glory and taught through dramatic events that He alone is sovereign. This account has been preserved in reliable manuscripts and upheld across centuries, testifying to God’s power and righteousness for all who examine its lessons.

What does the Bible say on New Jerusalem?
Top of Page
Top of Page