Stephen states Moses was “mighty in words” (Acts 7:22), but Exodus 4:10 depicts Moses as slow of speech. How do we reconcile these descriptions? Overview of the Apparent Discrepancy Acts 7:22 declares, “So Moses was educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians and was powerful in speech and action.” By contrast, Exodus 4:10 records Moses saying, “Please, Lord, I have never been eloquent—neither in the past nor since You have spoken to Your servant—for I am slow of speech and tongue.” At first glance, these verses can appear inconsistent. One passage celebrates Moses as “mighty in words,” while the other suggests he had difficulty speaking. Below, we explore various lines of evidence—linguistic, contextual, and theological—that help reconcile these descriptions. 1. Contextual Clues from Exodus and Acts In Exodus 4:10, Moses is responding to God’s direct call to confront Pharaoh. Having once been part of Egypt’s royal court, he fled into Midian for many years. By the time of his encounter with God at the burning bush, he had been living away from the Egyptian centers of learning and rhetoric. • During Moses’ years in the wilderness (Exodus 2:15–3:1), his earlier training may not have translated into public speaking confidence for a task as daunting as confronting a mighty king. • Acts 7:22, spoken by Stephen, highlights Moses’ upbringing in the royal court. This likely included training in Egyptian language, diplomacy, and possibly writing; however, skill in formal Egyptian discourse earlier in life does not necessarily negate later stages in which Moses felt personally inadequate. 2. Possible Linguistic Nuances In Exodus 4:10, the Hebrew expression often rendered “slow of speech and tongue” can convey a sense of hesitancy or difficulty in articulation, not necessarily the lack of all rhetorical ability. Some scholars propose Moses may have had a speech impediment or simply lacked confidence in persuasive oration. In Acts 7:22, the Greek phrase describing Moses as “mighty in words” (dynatos en logois) often refers to one’s power or authority when speaking, rather than mere eloquence alone. This nuance indicates that Moses’ words carried weight—rooted in his experiences and God’s call—despite how he felt about his own public speaking talents. 3. Shifts Across Moses’ Lifespan Moses’ life can be divided into three sets of forty years (Acts 7:23, 30): • First forty (in Egypt): He was raised in the courts of a highly advanced civilization. • Second forty (in Midian): He lived as a shepherd, removed from Egyptian political life. • Final forty (leading Israel): He guided the nation out of Egypt and through the wilderness. The Acts 7:22 statement could largely capture Moses’ stature and ability during his formative years in Egypt, whereas Exodus 4:10 reflects Moses’ concerns and insecurities at the time God commissioned him—a moment after four decades in relative isolation. 4. The Nature of God’s Call and Human Fear When God calls individuals to tasks beyond their comfort, they often respond with feelings of inadequacy (Jeremiah 1:6; Judges 6:15). Moses’ self-assessment—“I have never been eloquent”—could be an expression of fear rather than an absolute declaration of incapacity. While he had knowledge and training, he still felt unqualified to challenge Pharaoh. God’s empowerment is a consistent theme throughout Scripture. Despite human weaknesses, God accomplishes His purposes. Exodus 4:11–12 underscores this: “The LORD said to him, ‘Who gave man his mouth? … Now go! I will help you speak and teach you what to say.’” Moses’ limited confidence did not prevent God from using him mightily. 5. Biblical and Manuscript Consistency From the vantage point of reliable manuscript transmission, these passages remain harmonized in their original languages and subsequent copies. Early Hebrew manuscripts (evidenced by the Dead Sea Scrolls) preserve Exodus 4:10 consistently. Ancient Greek manuscripts (such as those forming the textual basis of the New Testament) offer a coherent narrative that does not present a genuine contradiction. Archaeological discoveries, such as references to Semitic presence in Egypt during a plausible timeframe, support the Old Testament’s historical details about Moses and the Exodus—reinforcing the notion that both the Exodus account and Stephen’s summary in Acts draw from the same foundational events without conflict. 6. The Dual Nature of Being “Mighty in Words” Being “mighty in words” can refer to multiple facets: 1. Authority and Wisdom: Moses possessed formidable knowledge and moral authority, arising from God's specific commissioning (Exodus 3:10). 2. Educational Background: Having been educated in the courts of Egypt, Moses understood Egyptian language, diplomacy, and administration (Acts 7:22). 3. God’s Anointing: Ultimately, it was God’s power that elevated Moses' words, illustrated when his commands brought forth miraculous events during the plagues (Exodus 7–12). Meanwhile, “slow of speech” conveys Moses’ personal trepidation and perceived limitations, not necessarily the absence of any ability to speak effectively. 7. Application and Theological Significance • Encouragement for Believers: Moses’ perceived weakness highlights how God works through imperfect vessels. This theme resonates throughout Scripture, showing God’s power is made perfect in human weakness (2 Corinthians 12:9). • God’s Sovereignty: The consistency between Exodus and Acts underscores God’s hand in history. He equips those He calls, regardless of personal shortcomings. • Reliability of Biblical Testimony: Various accounts in Scripture detail the same events from complementary angles. The synergy between Exodus and Acts authentically reflects how a historically real person can be simultaneously educated and influential (as Stephen testifies) yet feel insufficient in public oration (as Moses himself confesses). Conclusion The depiction of Moses as “mighty in words” in Acts yet “slow of speech” in Exodus does not constitute a contradiction. Rather, it underscores complexity in Moses’ life journey: well-trained and influential in his early years, yet humble and uncertain when faced with God’s daunting call. The careful wording and context in both passages show that Moses had formidable knowledge and authority but felt inadequate to use these gifts in confronting Pharaoh without God’s help. Far from an inconsistency, these verses paint a holistic picture of a leader whose natural abilities, combined with divine empowerment, were instrumental in the deliverance of Israel—an event that continues to be validated by multiple lines of evidence from antiquity. |
    |