Joshua 5:9: Is there any historical or archaeological evidence that this site, Gilgal, was ever known or marked as the place where Israel’s “disgrace” was removed? Background and Scriptural Context Joshua 5:9 states, “Then the LORD said to Joshua, ‘Today I have rolled away the disgrace of Egypt from you.’ So that place has been called Gilgal to this day.” This verse follows the account of Israel’s crossing of the Jordan River and the circumcision ceremony that renewed the covenant sign among the new generation. The text presents Gilgal as a significant location—both physically and spiritually—in Israel’s early history in the Promised Land. Scholars and historians have historically wondered whether there are discernible markers, references, or mentions in any external sources that identify Gilgal as the place where “disgrace” was removed. Below is an in-depth exploration of the biblical record, the meaning of “Gilgal,” possible archaeological sites, and external hints that contribute to our understanding of its significance. Etymology and Meaning of Gilgal The Hebrew verb “galal” means “to roll.” In Joshua 5:9, the text makes a direct connection between this verb and the name “Gilgal,” interpreted as the place where the LORD “rolled away” Israel’s disgrace. Along with the physical act of circumcision that took place there (Joshua 5:2–8), this terminology underscores a covenant renewal and a fresh beginning for the Israelites as they stepped into Canaan. In a ritual sense, naming Gilgal reminded future generations that they were no longer under Egypt’s scorn or bondage. This linking of name and event was common throughout the Old Testament era, when memorials and etymological naming often served as tangible reminders of significant redemptive moments (see Joshua 4:20–24 for the memorial stones set up in Gilgal). Potential Archaeological Investigations 1. Location Near Jericho Gilgal is frequently associated with a site near Jericho due to Joshua’s narrative placing it close to the Jordan River and the city walls Israel later assaulted (Joshua 6:1). Many believe Gilgal to have been located a few miles northeast of Jericho. Although multiple “Gilgal” locations are mentioned in Scripture, the one in Joshua 5 is commonly understood as near the river crossing. 2. Adam Zertal’s “Foot-Shaped” Sites While no definitive inscription proclaiming “this is Gilgal” has been discovered at a single location, the work of archaeologist Adam Zertal offers a potentially meaningful clue. Zertal uncovered several large, foot-shaped or circular enclosures in the Jordan Valley, sometimes referred to as “foot structures.” Some propose these enclosures could be the prototype for communal worship assembly areas set up by the early Israelites, possibly linked to the Hebrew concept of “Gilgal” or “camp of Israel.” Zertal’s hypothesis is not universally accepted, but it has stimulated ongoing discussions regarding distinct Israelite worship and gathering sites, especially those established soon after the conquest period. If one of these foot-shaped areas is indeed the Gilgal of Joshua 5, or at least representative of the kind of site it might have been, it would highlight an early practice of commemorating divine deliverance and covenant renewal. 3. Lack of Direct Inscription for “Disgrace Removed” No known ancient artifact explicitly labels a site as the place where Israel’s “disgrace” was rolled away. Scripture itself provides the principal testimony. In this respect, Gilgal follows a pattern seen with numerous biblical locations: the main source tying the name and meaning of a place to a theological or covenant event is the biblical text. Archaeologists continue to work in the region, and future excavations may yield additional corroboration. Gilgal’s Role and Reminders 1. Memorial Stones Joshua 4:20 recounts that the twelve stones taken from the Jordan River were set up at Gilgal, serving as a visual reminder of the miracle of crossing the Jordan on dry ground. This memorialization underscores Gilgal as a site of important ceremonial significance. 2. Spiritual Consecration At Gilgal, the act of circumcision (Joshua 5:2–8) fulfilled a necessary covenant sign not maintained during the wilderness wanderings. This moment eradicated “the disgrace of Egypt,” symbolically severing Israel from its past bondage. Gilgal thus became a central crossroads between the wilderness generation and the new generation ready to fulfill God’s promises in Canaan. 3. Subsequent Events at Gilgal The site reappears in later Old Testament narratives. For example, Gilgal served as a base of operations for Joshua (Joshua 9:6; 10:6, 15), a place of national gatherings (1 Samuel 11:14–15), and a location for significant prophetic statements (1 Samuel 13:7–14; 15:10–23). These moments reinforce that Gilgal continued to hold ritual and administrative importance beyond the initial conquest phase. External References and Historical Mentions 1. Josephus and Jewish Tradition Josephus (1st century AD) references places like Jericho in his writings, though he does not provide a direct archaeological description of Gilgal labeled as “the place of removed disgrace.” Rabbinic literature later speaks of Gilgal, but similarly, these texts mainly reflect the biblical narrative rather than providing new geographical or archaeological details. 2. No Direct Canaanite or Egyptian Inscription Surviving Canaanite or Egyptian records do not mention Gilgal as the place where a national disgrace was removed. Given the limited nature of external records from that period and the possibility that Gilgal’s importance was distinctly tied to Israel’s covenant identity, the silence from outside spheres is not surprising. 3. Recognition of Importance in Scripture The biblical record itself remains the primary and most detailed witness. And while external confirmation of specific theological events often remains limited, supporting archaeological discoveries—such as settlement patterns in the Jordan Valley—can align well with an Israelite presence and ritual practices during the approximate timeframe of the conquest. Conclusions on Archaeological and Historical Evidence The Bible, especially Joshua’s account, clearly states that Gilgal was named for the “rolling away” of Israel’s reproach. In terms of physical evidence—which can sometimes confirm precise ancient locations—archaeological investigations continue to examine the Jordan region, but no universally agreed-upon site has displayed a label or distinct monument explicitly confirming it as the place. Proposals like Adam Zertal’s foot-shaped enclosures provide intriguing possibilities, and the region near Jericho remains the strongest contender for the location. What endures beyond the limited external attestations is the biblical emphasis on Gilgal’s theological and historical roles. Gilgal is consistently highlighted across the Old Testament narrative as a focal point of worship, memorialization, and administration. The event in Joshua 5:9 stands as a defining marker for Israel’s identity, and that significance is woven throughout subsequent scriptures. While archaeology can provide valuable support, the biblical account stands as the most direct testimony linking Gilgal to the rolling away of disgrace. |
    |