What about all the contradictions between religions? I. Understanding the Core Question When exploring “What about all the contradictions between religions?”, the primary task is to identify why different belief systems often express seemingly incompatible claims. Religious pluralism presents a mosaic of moral codes, spiritual narratives, and views of the divine. Recognizing these differences requires careful examination of foundational documents, historical and archaeological evidence, and philosophical considerations. This entry will offer a comprehensive look at how Scripture addresses differing religions, discuss philosophical frameworks regarding truth, and draw on specific supporting evidence suggesting a single consistent revelation rather than multiple conflicting ones. II. The Biblical Perspective on Truth Scripture consistently teaches that truth originates from a singular, eternal Source rather than conflicting multiple sources. As the Berean Standard Bible teaches: • “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.’” (John 14:6) This statement situates truth and ultimate reconciliation with God solely through Jesus Christ. Far from allowing for equivalent paths, Scripture asserts a unique path of salvation. From a biblical standpoint, contradictory religious claims are not simultaneously valid because truth is seen as absolute rather than relative. In simple terms, if multiple religious statements openly disagree, they cannot all be correct in the same sense at the same time. III. The Law of Noncontradiction Applied Philosophically, the law of noncontradiction states that “A” and “not A” cannot both be true in the same way at the same time. For instance, if one religion claims God is personal and another claims God is strictly impersonal, they can’t both align with reality in that identical context. The Bible’s own approach to truth is consistent with this philosophical principle. Proverbs affirms the pursuit and exclusivity of truth: • “Buy the truth and do not sell it—wisdom, instruction and insight as well.” (Proverbs 23:23) This emphasis on acquiring and preserving truth supports the notion that contrary teachings cannot be equally valid. IV. Scriptural Cohesion and Divine Consistency 1. Consistency Across Testaments The Bible spans centuries of authorship, yet it retains a unified message of God’s plan for redemption. Archaeological findings—such as the Dead Sea Scrolls—verify that Old Testament passages have been faithfully preserved. These texts align with the New Testament teachings on Christ. Together, they convey a coherent narrative: human separation from God due to sin, the promise of redemption, and its fulfillment in Jesus (cf. Genesis 3:15 and Luke 24:44–47). 2. Dependability of Biblical Manuscripts Greco-Roman historians such as Tacitus and Josephus mention Jesus and the early Christian movement, lending external historical support to the Gospel narratives. In addition, thousands of Greek New Testament manuscripts, partial and complete, demonstrate that the biblical message on salvation does not waver despite minor textual variants. 3. Archaeological Resonance Excavations in the lands of ancient Israel, such as the discovery of the pool of Bethesda (John 5:2) and the inscription of Pontius Pilate’s name at Caesarea Maritima, reveal factual correlations between Scripture and historical/archaeological realities. These correlations reinforce the trustworthiness of the Bible in detailing historical events, thus supporting its broader truth claims against contradictory viewpoints. V. Contrasting Foundations of Different Religions 1. Nature of God Many faiths differ dramatically on God’s nature and attributes. For example, some traditions present God as an undifferentiated essence, while Christianity proclaims Him as personal and triune (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit). Such divergences point to underlying contradictory views rather than minor variations. 2. Pathways to Salvation Some religious frameworks stress works-based efforts for salvation (or enlightenment), while biblical teaching states: • “Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to mankind by which we must be saved.” (Acts 4:12) This is not merely a slight difference of ritual or practice—it is an essential claim about humanity’s standing before a holy God and our only hope found in Christ. 3. Christ’s Resurrection The resurrection stands as a historic and theological linchpin. According to 1 Corinthians 15, if Christ is not raised, then the faith of believers is in vain. This event has no parallel in many other religious systems, reinforcing a unique claim: a once-dead Messiah, now alive, offers proof of divine intervention and validation of His teaching. This resurrection claim is supported by accounts of women discovering the empty tomb and multiple recorded appearances of the risen Christ (1 Corinthians 15:3–8). Other religions may not claim such a historically testable event as the basis of their faith. VI. The Unity of Scripture Amid Contradictory Claims 1. Interwoven Prophetic Stream Old Testament prophecies, such as those in Isaiah 53, describe the coming Messiah in ways fulfilled by Jesus (Matthew 8:17). This long-running prophetic continuity shows a purposeful design, binding the Testaments into one unified testimony of Christ’s atoning work—an extraordinary hallmark absent from other religious texts. 2. Moral and Historical Completeness The Bible gives a cohesive moral vision spanning from the creation account (“God saw all that He had made, and it was very good,” Genesis 1:31) to the promise of a new heaven and new earth (Revelation 21:1). The grand storyline traces humanity’s fall into sin, God’s redemptive interventions, and the final restoration, presenting a panorama otherwise missing or contradicted in other belief systems. 3. Reliance on Divine Revelation While many faiths include moral philosophies or mystical insights, the Bible uniquely grounds its authority in verifiable historical events (e.g., the Exodus, the Babylonian Exile, Christ’s passion week). This historical grounding sets biblical revelation apart from religious systems more reliant on private revelations or later interpretations. VII. Harmonizing Exclusive Claims and Respect Respect for individuals of different religious persuasions remains integral to Christian behavior (cf. 1 Peter 3:15: “...do this with gentleness and respect”). Yet the biblical message itself draws a distinction between the truth revealed in Scripture versus contradictory religious claims. Engaging in sincere dialogue requires acknowledging that radically different truth claims cannot all be correct, yet maintaining compassion toward all people. VIII. Conclusion: Why Contradictions Exist and How to Respond Religions may contradict each other due to differing understandings of God, salvation, history, and scriptural authority. The Bible provides a consistent, historically anchored, and theologically coherent revelation of one God who created the universe, one Savior who rose from the dead, and one coherent path of redemption made possible through Christ. Believers can respond to contradictory religious claims by: • Studying Scripture’s unified presentation of truth. • Examining archaeological, historical, and manuscript evidence. • Demonstrating a gracious, respectful approach to dialogue. • Inviting others to consider the historical resurrection and the cohesive narrative of Scripture. In addressing differences between religions, the biblical perspective points to one eternal Creator, one plan of salvation, and one consistent word. The contradictions between other faiths and Christianity support the teaching that truth rests in the historical, demonstrable, and spiritually transformative revelation found in the Bible: “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness.” (2 Timothy 3:16) Ultimately, the question “What about all the contradictions between religions?” finds its resolution by looking to the unique, consistent, and supernaturally validated authority of the Word of God, culminating in the resurrected Christ. |
    |