Could the depiction of sixty warriors guarding Solomon’s carriage (Song of Solomon 3:7–8) be an exaggeration, and if so, does it conflict with the notion of biblical inerrancy? Overview of the Passage Song of Solomon 3:7–8 reads: “Behold, Solomon’s carriage, escorted by sixty warriors from the mighty men of Israel. All are skilled with the sword, experienced in warfare. Each has his sword at his side prepared for the terror of the night.” Some have wondered whether this mention of “sixty warriors” is a poetic exaggeration or a precise historical record. Moreover, this raises the question of whether any apparent hyperbole in Scripture could undermine the belief that the Bible is inerrant. Below is a careful examination of the textual setting, ancient cultural context, literary genre, and theological implications to address whether this depiction must be taken literally, how it could be understood, and whether it creates any conflict with biblical inerrancy. 1. Literary and Cultural Context In ancient Near Eastern cultures, royal processions and state occasions were often accompanied by large numbers of guards, soldiers, and attendants to highlight the king’s power and prestige. The number sixty, specifically, was used in various settings in biblical times to convey a sense of completeness or might (for instance, referencing rounded numbers in genealogies and armies). The Song of Solomon is recognized primarily as poetic and metaphorical. While it certainly has historical touchpoints, its genre allows for lyrical descriptions that emphasize beauty, majesty, and splendor. Thus, reading passages simply as rigid historical reports does not fully capture the poetic nuance. The mention of “sixty warriors” would have communicated not only a substantial protective detail but also the awe-inspiring security and status surrounding Solomon. 2. Possible Poetic Device or Literal Reference Two primary views can be considered regarding the mention of sixty warriors guarding Solomon’s carriage: A. Poetic or Symbolic Language 1. Poetic texts often use heightened language to stress a point. This style is comparable to other biblical passages that use vivid figures of speech (e.g., describing Israel’s population as being like “the sand on the seashore,” Judges 7:12). 2. Even if taken as a poetic device, the truth conveyed—that Solomon’s carriage was well-guarded—is not diminished. Scriptural inerrancy pertains to the truth the text communicates, not necessarily a literal measure in every poetic expression. B. Literal Explanation 1. Solomon’s reign was marked by significant wealth (1 Kings 10:14–29) and a well-equipped army (1 Kings 9:22–23), so assembling a detail of sixty skilled warriors was feasible. 2. Archaeological exploration in sites like Megiddo reveals the advanced nature of Solomon’s kingdom, including fortifications that could support large numbers of armed troops. Whether God’s Word is using an exact number or a poetic representation of a large protective guard, the passage communicates a real statement of security and dignity surrounding the royal procession. 3. Ancient Royal Guards and Processions Outside evidence and ancient documents describe large royal entourages in the Near East. In Egyptian tomb paintings or Assyrian palace reliefs, rulers are depicted with numerous guards to display authority. Similarly, Josephus, a 1st-century AD Jewish historian, describes how King Herod’s retinue was extensive, indicating that a royal escort with many soldiers was not uncommon. While the exact number of sixty is not directly attested in external inscriptions for Solomon’s personal guard, there is enough evidence to suggest that large protective details were normal. In light of these customs, the depiction fits well with known historical practices, whether symbolic or strict historical count. 4. Perspective on Biblical Inerrancy Biblical inerrancy teaches that the Scriptures, in their original manuscripts, are without error in all that they affirm. This does not negate the Bible’s use of metaphor, hyperbole, poetry, or other literary devices that were common in the ancient world. 1. Poetic Expressions • The assertion of inerrancy does not demand that imagery in a lyrical poem be interpreted as a strict count unless the context makes a literal reading mandatory. • Song of Solomon uses lavish language for love, romance, and majesty, and a slightly hyperbolic or grandiose number would no more threaten inerrancy than references to the “pillars of heaven” in poetic passages threaten the reality of the earth’s shape. 2. Consistency of Scripture • If the biblical text claims to be offering a factual statement in a historical context (e.g., the census of Israel’s fighting men in Numbers), then it must be accurate in that specific historical setting. • Song of Solomon, recognized as poetic wisdom literature, naturally incorporates figurative language that enhances the main truth being delivered. 3. Intended Meaning • Inerrancy commits that the meaning God intended to convey is delivered faithfully. If the text’s meaning is that Solomon had a strong, well-prepared guard, then whether the actual number was precisely sixty or simply an expression of a fully adequate detail does not detract from Scripture’s veracity. 5. Harmonizing the Magnificence of Solomon’s Reign Solomon’s kingdom was immensely prosperous. According to 1 Kings 4:21, he “ruled over all the kingdoms west of the Euphrates—from Tiphsah to Gaza—and had peace on every side.” Such prosperity allowed for a show of grandeur in displays of royal affluence, including well-staffed military ranks. In keeping with the usual biblical portrayal, the image of sixty valiant warriors forms part of the larger narrative emphasizing Solomon’s renown, his resources, and the honor given to him as king. The fact that the Song of Solomon uses romantic and poetic language does not undercut the historical realities of Solomon’s vast wealth, his large labor force detailed in Chronicles and Kings, or his military capacity. 6. Scholarly and Historical Consensus From a manuscript perspective, no known textual variant calls into question the mention of sixty warriors. Major biblical manuscripts (including the Masoretic Tradition reflected in ancient scrolls at Qumran) align on this citation. Textual reliability is firmly established by multiple lines of manuscript evidence, consolidated by experts in the field. Interpreters through church history have read Song of Solomon allegorically, romantically, or literally, yet virtually none took this depiction as contradictory. Rather, early church teachers treated the number as indicating completeness and fullness of protective strength—pointing to the overarching relationship and security theme in the poem. Such unified tradition further diminishes any notion that the text creates a problem for inerrancy. 7. Practical Takeaway When approaching poetic passages: • Understand the genre. Is it narrative, law, wisdom, or poetry? How does that shape interpretation? • Identify the central teaching. Ask what the writer intended to communicate about the king’s glory, honor, and protection. • Recognize that figurative language and symbolism remain consistent with truth. Biblical inerrancy affirms the trustworthiness of Scripture, not a flattening of genre distinctions. Even if one concludes the number sixty is figurative, it does not diminish the truth that King Solomon was powerfully guarded. Likewise, if one holds the number to be literal, the text in no way contradicts known historical realities. In both cases, biblical inerrancy remains intact. Conclusion The portrayal of sixty warriors guarding Solomon’s carriage in Song of Solomon 3:7–8 need not be viewed as a contradiction, nor does it undermine the reliability of Scripture. Whether poetic hyperbole or a straightforward description, the message is the same: Solomon’s regal splendor and security were beyond question. This passage aligns comfortably with the surrounding historical evidence, the literary style of the book, and the overarching consistency of Scripture. There is no substantive conflict with biblical inerrancy, which fully accommodates poetic language within the text’s inspired message of truth. |
    |