(Matthew 23:9) How is “call no man father” reconciled with traditions that use fatherly titles for clergy? I. The Context and Statement of Matthew 23:9 Matthew 23 presents a series of warnings and criticisms directed at certain religious leaders who prioritized their own prestige over humble service. The key verse reads, “And do not call anyone on earth your father, for you have one Father, who is in heaven.” (Matthew 23:9). In its broader context, Jesus admonishes the scribes and Pharisees for seeking honorific titles to elevate themselves (Matthew 23:5–7). The verse therefore takes aim at prideful attitudes that would supplant the supreme fatherly authority of God. II. Historical and Linguistic Background A. Jewish Tradition and Titles Within first-century Jewish society, religious teachers and leaders—such as the Pharisees—often received honorific titles that reflected authority and lineage. “Rabbi” (meaning “my teacher” or “my master”) and “father” could be used figuratively to designate someone’s spiritual mentor or origin (cf. Malachi 2:10, which emphasizes God as Father). B. The Greek Term for “Father” The Greek word used for “father” in Matthew 23:9 (pater) appears in many New Testament contexts, sometimes literally (indicating a biological father) and sometimes figuratively (as in Paul’s reference to becoming a father to believers in the faith). Thus, the usage is nuanced; the issue is not the word per se but the authority one ascribes to a human with that title. III. Scriptural Harmony and Additional Texts A. Paul’s Reference to “Father” in a Spiritual Sense In 1 Corinthians 4:15, Paul writes, “For in Christ Jesus I became your father through the gospel.” Paul is not disobeying Jesus’ teaching; rather, he is acknowledging a mentorship role and the responsibility of having led them to faith in Christ. This illustrates that “father” can be used correctly in a spiritual sense, provided it does not usurp God’s ultimate fatherhood. B. Other Biblical Mentorship Language Throughout the New Testament, terms like “brother,” “sister,” and even “child in the faith” (1 Timothy 1:2) highlight familial imagery. They reflect a community joined under the Fatherhood of God, yet still recognizing roles of guidance and authority among believers. IV. Jesus’ Purposeful Hyperbole and Focus on Heart Attitude A. Hyperbole in Teaching Jesus frequently employs hyperbole to underscore critical truths (e.g., Matthew 5:29–30 regarding removing an eye or a hand to avoid sin). In Matthew 23, His counsel to avoid calling anyone “father” on earth is part of a broader warning against pride, spiritual hypocrisy, and self-exaltation. B. The Core Issue: Rival Authority By instructing that only God be regarded as Father (Matthew 23:9) and Teacher (Matthew 23:10), Jesus emphasizes that we must not give any human being the ultimate spiritual authority belonging to God alone. The lesson is a reminder not to elevate religious leaders as infallible figures who can overshadow the Father’s sovereignty. V. Early Believers, Church History, and the Use of “Father” A. Early Church Practice Writings from the early Church Fathers (e.g., Ignatius of Antioch, Clement of Rome) recognize distinctions in roles such as bishops, elders, and deacons. While some used fatherly terminology as a mark of respect for those who shepherded the flock, they also cautioned that one’s allegiance and worship belong to God alone. B. Tradition vs. Exaltation Many Christian traditions later adopted “fatherly” titles for clergy—“Father,” “Abbot,” or “Pope” (deriving from “papa”). The question arises whether this practice contradicts Matthew 23:9. Historical documentation, such as the letters of early bishops preserved in various manuscript collections, indicates these titles were meant to reflect a spiritual mentorship, akin to Paul’s usage in 1 Corinthians 4:15, rather than to supplant God’s authority. VI. Reconciliation with Modern Traditions A. Contextual Clarity When clergy are addressed as “father,” the typical intent is to acknowledge a role of pastoral care. Just as a biological father provides guidance, protection, and love, a spiritual father has a responsibility for the spiritual well-being of the congregation. B. Guarding Against Misuse Matthew 23:9 cautions that any use of titles must not attribute ultimate spiritual authority to a human. No believer should treat a spiritual leader as the final word in place of God’s revealed Word. Instead, the clergy’s role is to direct believers to the Father in heaven (James 1:17). VII. Examination of Manuscript Evidence A. Consistency in the Gospel of Matthew Leading manuscript witnesses—such as Codex Sinaiticus (4th century) and Codex Vaticanus (4th century)—uniformly retain Matthew 23:9 without textual alterations or omissions. Scholarly works by those who have collated ancient manuscripts (e.g., the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece editors) confirm the verse’s authenticity. B. No Contradictory Variants Greek texts used in producing modern translations (including the Berean Standard Bible) reveal no significant variants that would alter the command or dilute its meaning. The consistency across manuscripts underscores that the teaching, rightly understood, is integral to Matthew’s gospel, reminding readers not to elevate leaders above God. VIII. Practical Application and Conclusion A. Proper Reverence for God When believers interpret Christ’s words in Matthew 23:9, they are reminded of reverence for God as the ultimate source of life and truth. While respecting and honoring spiritual mentors, one must not place them at the level of divine authority. B. Honoring Teachers and Leaders Without Idolizing Them Romans 13:7 encourages showing “honor to whom honor is due,” yet Scripture throughout insists that God alone is the absolute authority. Calling a leader “father” should be an expression of love and respect that acknowledges God’s position above all. C. The Heart of the Matter Ultimately, the “call no man father” passage serves as a safeguard against prideful leadership. It fosters humility, ensuring that titles never overshadow the reverence due to the one perfect Father, our Creator and Savior. Thus, traditions that use fatherly titles for clergy are not inherently disobedient to Matthew 23:9, provided they do not elevate human leaders to divine status or divert glory from God. Instead, believers can honor their spiritual leaders while always remembering that their greatest devotion belongs to the one Father in heaven. |
    |