1 Corinthians 16:19 – Is there any credible extra-biblical source confirming Aquila and Prisca’s house church, or is this couple’s ministry only found in Scripture? Historical Background of Aquila and Prisca Aquila and Prisca (also known as Priscilla) appear multiple times in Paul’s letters and in the Book of Acts. They were Jewish believers who had been forced to leave Rome (cf. Acts 18:2) under Emperor Claudius’s expulsion of Jews (often dated to around AD 49). The Berean Standard Bible gives a brief glimpse of their service in 1 Corinthians 16:19, where Paul writes in part: “…Aquila and Prisca greet you warmly in the Lord…” (1 Corinthians 16:19). Their ministry, as mentioned in several New Testament passages (Acts 18:1–3; Romans 16:3–5; 2 Timothy 4:19), included hosting fellow believers in their home for worship and instruction. They are portrayed as committed co-laborers with Paul, teaching and explaining “the way of God more accurately” (Acts 18:26) to Apollos, and they appear to host gatherings wherever they settled—first in Corinth, then in Ephesus, and eventually back in Rome. Although Scripture clearly records their significant impact, many wonder if there is any corroborating extra-biblical source confirming the details of their house church. House Churches in the First Century Meeting in homes was a common practice among the earliest believers. These “house churches” were natural gathering points in a culture where official church buildings did not yet exist and where followers of Jesus were often viewed with suspicion. Archaeological discoveries like the third-century AD house church at Dura-Europos in Syria (though later in date and unrelated directly to Aquila and Prisca) confirm that believers adapted private homes for worship. This general evidence supports the New Testament’s portrayal of small communities worshiping in residences. Aquila and Prisca’s own practice fits right in with this known model. In Romans 16:3–5, Paul greets “the church that meets at their house,” indicating they consistently opened their home for ministry. From a cultural and historical standpoint, nothing in this account contradicts what historians know about how early Christians gathered, especially in the days before Christianity was legalized in the Roman Empire. Survey of Known Extra-Biblical Sources Despite the couple’s prominence in several New Testament passages, there is no currently known reference to Aquila and Prisca in the surviving works of secular historians like Suetonius, Tacitus, or Josephus. Likewise, the earliest post-biblical Christian writings (e.g., the letters of Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, or the fragments collected in early Church histories) do not seem to mention them by name. 1. Secular Historians: Historians of the first and early second centuries such as Tacitus and Suetonius sometimes made broad references to the expulsion of Jews by Emperor Claudius. Suetonius (Claudius 25.4) speaks of Jews making disturbances “because of Chrestus.” While this corroborates the scriptural note that Jews were forced out of Rome, there is no direct naming of Aquila and Prisca or their house church. 2. Church Fathers: Early Christian writers (commonly referred to as the “Fathers”) cite numerous New Testament figures, yet no direct mention of Aquila and Prisca’s house church has been preserved in the most accessible writings of these sources. Some later traditions or martyrologies might list them as saints or mention their dedication to the faith, but these are not first-century or early second-century attestations. They also do not add historical details beyond the New Testament’s testimony. 3. Archaeological Data: Although general archaeological data confirms the practice of meeting in homes, there is no discernible inscription, papyrus, or artifact explicitly linking Aquila and Prisca to a particular dwelling. The scarcity of direct material evidence for specific house churches in the mid-first century AD is common, since such communities were relatively small and often discreet. Veracity of Biblical Testimony Rather than undermining the biblical record, the lack of external mention of Aquila and Prisca is unsurprising for a small fellowship group in an individual home. The references to their hosting believers in Corinth (Acts 18:1–3), then in Ephesus (1 Corinthians 16:19), and later in Rome (Romans 16:3–5) align with multiple cross-references within the New Testament. Paul’s epistles and Luke’s account in Acts exhibit reliable historical markers, such as the Gallio Inscription at Delphi that helps date Paul’s time in Corinth to AD 51–52. These points reinforce the broader historical grounding of the biblical narrative. The internal consistency of Scripture regarding Aquila and Prisca—as well as the broader context of first-century Christian gatherings—provides a coherent picture. Even though no outside record has emerged that specifically names them and their house church, the New Testament evidence remains credible and fits the historical setting. Since written documents in the Greco-Roman world often centered on emperors, officials, or major events, it would be unusual to find detailed secular references to a particular couple hosting a small religious assembly in their home. Conclusion No extant extra-biblical source explicitly confirms Aquila and Prisca’s house church in Corinth or Ephesus. Their ministry is depended upon Scripture alone. Nevertheless, archaeological and historical data on first-century house churches, the broader edict of Claudius, and the dating of Paul’s mission through secular inscriptions all affirm that the New Testament’s description of them is entirely plausible. From the references in Acts, 1 Corinthians, Romans, and 2 Timothy, one can see that Aquila and Prisca’s role was impactful in strengthening early communities of believers. Their home-based fellowship fits with what researchers know about early Christian gatherings. The consistent scriptural testimony stands as the chief witness to their dedicated ministry, and in the absence of a direct extra-biblical reference, these reliable biblical panoramas remain the definitive record of their legacy. |
    |