Evidence of mediums in ancient Israel?
Is there any archaeological or historical evidence confirming the existence of mediums in ancient Israel to support the story of 1 Samuel 28:7–9?

Definition of Mediums and Spiritists

A “medium,” often rendered as “spiritist” or one who communicates with the dead, refers to an individual who professes the ability to contact and interact with the spirits of deceased persons or supernatural entities. In the context of 1 Samuel 28:7–9, Saul seeks out a woman with such an ability so that he might speak to the late prophet Samuel. Although these practices were explicitly forbidden among the Israelites (cf. Deuteronomy 18:10–11), their mention indicates that such figures existed in the surrounding cultures and, at times, even within Israel itself.


Biblical Context of 1 Samuel 28:7–9

1 Samuel 28 recounts how King Saul, facing the threat of the Philistine armies and feeling abandoned by divine guidance, turns to a medium at Endor. Verse 7 states: “Then Saul said to his servants, ‘Find me a woman who is a medium, so I can go and consult her.’” This directive shows that Saul believed such individuals did reside in Israel, despite earlier efforts to expel them (1 Samuel 28:3).

In verses 8–9, Saul disguises himself to meet the woman, who expresses fear because Saul had driven out mediums from the land. This uneasy exchange indicates that the practice certainly existed but was suppressed by official decree. The biblical text, therefore, not only presents the account of a specific medium but also implies a larger context in which mediums were once active among the Israelites.


Archaeological and Historical Background

Several lines of evidence suggest that various forms of necromancy, divination, and mediumistic practices were present in the broader Ancient Near East, including Canaan, which encompassed ancient Israel:

1. Ugaritic Texts (Ras Shamra): Excavations at Ras Shamra (ancient Ugarit) have revealed texts documenting rituals to contact the departed. While these texts were not produced in Israel, Ugarit lay geographically close to Canaan, sharing cultural and religious customs. These findings corroborate that attempts to communicate with the deceased were a known and practiced phenomenon in the neighboring region.

2. Egyptian and Mesopotamian Records: Both Egyptian funerary practices (as contained in certain funerary spells) and Mesopotamian incantation texts refer to seeking guidance from the dead. Although these do not specifically cite “mediums in Israel,” they demonstrate that necromantic practices were widespread in the ancient world, making it likely, from a historical standpoint, that such traditions could appear in Israel as well.

3. Incantation Bowls (Later Period): While more common in the Babylonian and Persian periods (often post-exilic for Israel), the discovery of “incantation bowls” in Mesopotamia underscores a long-standing tradition of seeking supernatural favor or knowledge. Such persistent beliefs in contacting the spirit realm lend plausibility to earlier mediums and necromancers in Israelite society.

4. Household and Cultic Figurines in Canaanite Sites: Numerous archaeological excavations in regions once occupied by Canaanites (and later Israel) have uncovered clay figurines and cultic items. Some scholars propose these figurines played roles in domestic religious practices, which might include attempts to influence or contact the spirit world. While these do not constitute direct proof of “mediums,” they reflect a cultural milieu in which practices forbidden in the biblical text could have been clandestinely maintained.


References in Extra-Biblical Jewish Literature

Other Jewish writings, although later in composition, offer insight into how the tradition surrounding mediums and necromancy was remembered:

1. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews: Josephus (1st century AD) references the biblical narrative of Saul and the medium, reflecting continued knowledge of the incident in Jewish tradition. Josephus treats the story as historically grounded, indicating that later Jewish historians did not dismiss the existence of mediums in antiquity as a mere legend.

2. Rabbinic Writings (Talmudic References): The Talmud also discusses prohibitions against sorcery and necromancy. While it does not cite archaeological artifacts, its preservation of the biblical injunctions shows that mediums were considered real and dangerous. The repeated prohibitions would be unnecessary if no one practiced these rites or if they were unknown in the land.


Scholarly Perspectives

Most ancient Near Eastern historians and biblical scholars broadly recognize that, like their neighbors, the Israelites would have encountered and sometimes practiced forms of divination and communication with the dead. Some debate exists over how widespread or tolerated these practices were, especially given the strong biblical prohibitions against them. Nevertheless, even skeptics acknowledge that references to mediums and spiritists in Israel’s texts reflect an awareness of such practitioners, which is consistent with the social-religious environment of the time.


Answering the Question: Archaeological and Historical Confirmation

• While no single artifact has been found that explicitly states, “This belonged to a medium of Israel,” the collective weight of evidence—Ugaritic texts describing necromancy, widespread Near Eastern records depicting mediumistic rituals, household cultic objects suggesting clandestine worship, and scriptural/legal prohibitions—confirms that people claiming to operate as mediums were known in the broader region.

• The biblical narrative of 1 Samuel 28:7–9 aligns with these contexts. The prohibition against mediums (e.g., Deuteronomy 18:10–11) would have been unnecessary if no such practices existed. Josephus’s account, Rabbinic literature, and comparative ancient Near Eastern evidence converge to show that mediums were recognized practitioners, even if condemned in Israelite law.

• The very fact that Saul had to disguise himself in 1 Samuel 28 underscores that these individuals existed but had been forced underground. This scenario resonates with how forbidden religious practices often continued surreptitiously in many ancient cultures, even in the face of official bans.


Conclusion

Multiple lines of evidence—Scripture, neighboring cultures’ texts, archaeological finds illustrating spiritual practices, and extra-biblical Jewish writings—support the existence of mediums or spiritists in the ancient Near East and, by extension, within ancient Israel. Although the Old Testament repeatedly condemns such practices, their presence was a reality that sometimes intersected with Israelite life, as vividly depicted in 1 Samuel 28:7–9. This coherence with archaeological and historical data strengthens the conclusion that mediums did indeed operate in ancient Israel, thus supporting the biblical narrative’s depiction.

Does 1 Samuel 28 conflict with other bans?
Top of Page
Top of Page