Does 1 Chronicles 28:5, where David says God chose Solomon as king, align with or contradict other biblical passages about political intrigue in David's succession? 1. Introduction to the Question The passage in question is 1 Chronicles 28:5, where David speaks of how the LORD specifically chose Solomon to succeed him on the throne. The verse states, “He has chosen my son Solomon to sit on the throne of the kingdom of the LORD over Israel”. Some readers point to other biblical accounts describing tensions and aspirations among David’s other sons—most notably Adonijah (1 Kings 1)—and wonder if David’s statement here contradicts the apparent political maneuvering elsewhere in Scripture. Below is a comprehensive look at the relevant passages, cultural background, and theological themes to demonstrate that 1 Chronicles 28:5 aligns with, rather than contradicts, the broader biblical narrative. 2. Scriptural Context and Purpose of Chronicles Chronicles is often understood as emphasizing God’s covenant faithfulness and the continuity of legitimate worship in Israel. The Chronicler (the author of 1–2 Chronicles) writes from a later historical perspective, highlighting the Davidic line and priestly matters to encourage the post-exilic community. • 1 Chronicles 28 details David’s public commissioning of Solomon before the assembly of Israel. • The message is that the monarchy is more than mere politics—it is part of God’s broader redemptive plan. By underscoring God’s specific selection of Solomon, the Chronicler shows that the Davidic throne rests upon divine choice rather than human ambition. 3. Parallel Narratives: 1 Kings and the Reality of Rivalry The historical books of Samuel and Kings provide a straightforward chronicle of the political climate in which David’s descendants jostled for power. According to 1 Kings 1, Adonijah, one of David’s older sons, attempted to set himself up as king while David was elderly and less active. This narrative includes: • Adonijah’s self-promotion and gathering of supporters (1 Kings 1:5–10). • Intervention by Nathan the prophet and Bathsheba to remind David of his promise regarding Solomon’s kingship (1 Kings 1:11–27). • David’s formal declaration of Solomon as successor, swiftly followed by Solomon’s anointing (1 Kings 1:28–40). Far from undermining David’s statement in 1 Chronicles 28:5, the 1 Kings account demonstrates the tension between God’s plan and human attempts to circumvent that plan. The fact that Adonijah tried to secure the throne underscores the competitiveness of succession but does not negate the LORD’s decree. 4. Divine Selection vs. Human Intrigue Scripture frequently portrays God’s choice and human action as intertwined: • In David’s own selection, while Saul remained king, God instructed Samuel to anoint David (1 Samuel 16). Yet David still faced hostility from Saul before becoming king. • Likewise with Solomon, God’s designation did not shield him from sibling rivalries but ensured that ultimately God’s purpose prevailed. Thus, the political challenges seen in 1 Kings 1 do not present a contradiction: they reveal the human side of power struggles while reaffirming that God’s sovereign choice stands firm. 5. Consistency Across the Texts To address the question of contradiction directly, note several points of consistency: 1. David’s Promise and God’s Covenant Second Samuel 7:12–13 sets forth God’s promise that David’s offspring would rule and build a house for God’s Name. Solomon’s selection emerges as the fulfillment of this covenant promise rather than a surprising or random favor. 2. Chronicles’ Emphasis on Divine Action The Chronicler aims to show God’s big-picture direction of Israel’s history. Where Kings records more of the political twists and failures of the monarchy, Chronicles highlights how, in spite of those trials, God’s word and covenant remain unbroken. 3. Resolution in 1 Kings 1–2 The end result in 1 Kings—Solomon’s enthronement—matches David’s claim in 1 Chronicles 28:5. The method for achieving that end (including Nathan’s counsel and David’s public pronouncement) showcases the interplay of divine appointment and human obedience. 6. Archaeological and Textual Corroboration Archaeological finds such as the Tel Dan Stele recognize the “House of David,” supporting the historicity of the Davidic dynasty. While the stele itself does not describe the specific order of David’s successors, it provides external evidence for the royal lineage chronicled in Scripture. Moreover, preserved manuscripts and textual traditions (e.g., the Septuagint, the Masoretic Text, and manuscript fragments found among the Dead Sea Scrolls) consistently present the narrative in which Solomon, not Adonijah, took the throne. 7. Theological Implications and Lessons From a theological perspective, Solomon’s divine appointment underscores key principles foundational to the biblical storyline: • Sovereignty of the LORD – Regardless of human schemes, God’s chosen king was established. • Faithfulness of God – The LORD fulfilled His promise to David (2 Samuel 7), affirming that He remains true to His covenant. • Human Responsibility – The stories of Adonijah, Absalom, and others reveal that while God’s plan is certain, individuals remain accountable for their actions—whether in obedience or rebellion. 8. Conclusion First Chronicles 28:5 aligns perfectly with the broader scriptural portrait of David’s succession. While the books of Samuel and Kings unveil complicated political realities, these do not contradict the Chronicler’s emphasis on Solomon as God’s chosen heir. Instead, both perspectives converge: God’s purpose stands, even when human ambition intervenes. David’s pronouncement in 1 Chronicles 28:5—“He has chosen my son Solomon to sit on the throne of the kingdom of the LORD over Israel”—is confirmed by the eventual outcome depicted in 1 Kings 1–2. Far from a discrepancy, the biblical accounts complement each other. They illustrate that human intrigue and divine sovereignty can simultaneously exist in the unfolding of redemptive history. |
    |