Do references to the Assyrian kings Pul and Tiglath-Pileser in 1 Chronicles 5:26 align with known Assyrian records and timelines? Overview of 1 Chronicles 5:26 1 Chronicles 5:26 states, “So the God of Israel stirred the spirit of Pul king of Assyria (that is Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria), who carried the Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh into exile. He took them to Halah, Habor, Hara, and the Gozan River, where they remain to this day.” This verse raises the question of whether these references—to “Pul” and “Tiglath-Pileser”—align with known Assyrian history and records. Below, this entry explores the pertinent historical, textual, and archaeological factors. Pul and Tiglath-Pileser in the Biblical Text The biblical narrative identifies “Pul king of Assyria” and “Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria” as key figures who led the northern tribes into exile. The text itself clarifies that Pul and Tiglath-Pileser refer to the same monarchy (1 Chronicles 5:26). This is consistent with other references in Scripture that discuss tribute paid to Pul and subsequent campaigns of Tiglath-Pileser III in the region (compare 2 Kings 15:19 with 2 Kings 15:29). In 1 Chronicles 5:26, the exile of the Reubenites, Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh is dated to the period of these Assyrian invasions, which is historically placed in the 8th century BC. The alignment between the biblical record and Assyrian king lists is often examined to verify the credibility of Old Testament historical accounts. Identification of Pul with Tiglath-Pileser III Many scholars accept that Pul is another name—or possibly a throne name—associated with Tiglath-Pileser III. Several historical conjectures propose that “Pul” was a shortened version of “Pulu,” a name that may have been used prior to him taking the throne as Tiglath-Pileser III. • Tiglath-Pileser III reigned approximately from 745 BC to 727 BC. • During his reign, he embarked on widespread military campaigns in Syro-Palestine, which aligns with the biblical account of his activities in the northern kingdom of Israel (2 Kings 15:29; 2 Kings 16:7–9). Correlations with Known Assyrian Records 1. Royal Inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser III: Excavations at sites such as Nimrud (ancient Kalhu) have yielded cuneiform inscriptions detailing Tiglath-Pileser III’s military campaigns, deportations, and tribute lists from subjugated territories. These inscribed annals mention regions corresponding to those recorded in the biblical accounts of Assyrian incursions into Israel. 2. Tribute Payments: 2 Kings 15:19 references Menahem of Israel paying a tribute of a thousand talents of silver to Pul. The practice of demanding substantial tribute is well attested in Assyrian records and was a hallmark of Tiglath-Pileser III’s expansionist policies. 3. The Assyrian Eponym Canon: This detailed list of officials for each year of the Assyrian Empire includes references to Tiglath-Pileser III’s campaigns throughout the Levant, corroborating the approximate dates and expansions that match the era of 1 Chronicles 5:26. 4. Deportation Practices: The biblical text specifies that these Israelite tribes were taken to Halah, Habor, and other areas near the Gozan River. Parallel Assyrian annals describe the empire’s common practice of relocating conquered peoples in order to quell uprisings and assimilate them into the empire, precisely matching 1 Chronicles 5:26. Scholars who have studied these inscriptions—often grouped in compendiums such as “Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament” (ANET)—note the coherence between the biblical place names (Halah, Habor, Gozan) and the attested geographic regions under Assyrian control. Timeline Alignment From cuneiform records, Tiglath-Pileser III initiated aggressive expansion around 745 BC. The northern kingdom of Israel faced repeated Assyrian pressure under multiple kings, culminating in significant exiles by the mid-8th century BC. The biblical chronology places the exile of parts of Israel’s population around the reigns of kings such as Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea, which broadly fits the external Assyrian timeline. By cross-referencing events: • Menahem’s payment of tribute to Pul (2 Kings 15:19) is commonly dated to about 738 BC. • Exiles under Tiglath-Pileser III (1 Chronicles 5:26; 2 Kings 15:29) connect well with Inscription references to the vast deportations around 733–732 BC. Though exact regnal-date synchronisms can be challenging due to ancient record-keeping methods, the general overlap is widely accepted among historians, linguists, and Old Testament scholars. Archaeological and Historical Evidence 1. Nimrud Discoveries: Several stelae, annals, and tablets discovered at Nimrud (ancient Kalhu) include references to campaigns that reached the borders of Israel. Although these records usually mention major cities, the deportation policy described dovetails with the biblical testimony of removing entire populations (1 Chronicles 5:26). 2. Archaeological Layering: Excavations in sites in Israel’s northern region—such as Hazor—reveal destruction and transitional layers that correlate with Neo-Assyrian incursions of the 8th century BC. While these do not always name specific kings in the strata, they align with the known periods of Assyrian invasion. 3. Limestone Reliefs and Wall Inscriptions: Reliefs portraying war scenes, subjugation of peoples, and the forced movement of conquered populations often reference nations in the Levant. Though the biblical term “Pul” does not appear in direct Assyrian texts, Tiglath-Pileser III’s own inscriptions confirm large-scale assaults and exiles of peoples from the western frontiers (the region of Syria-Palestine, including Israel). Consistent Chronological Framework The mention in 1 Chronicles 5:26 that Pul and Tiglath-Pileser are the same ruler aligns with Assyrian records attributing expansions and exiles to one king, Tiglath-Pileser III. The biblical text’s use of dual naming can be seen as a reflection of different names—perhaps Pul as an earlier name and Tiglath-Pileser III as the official throne name—or a recognition that “Pul” was how he was referred to some in the West, while “Tiglath-Pileser” was the full imperial title. All these details create a coherent picture: the biblical references to Pul (Tiglath-Pileser III) fit firmly into the known 8th century BC context of the Assyrian Empire’s military and administrative practices. Conclusion References to Pul (Tiglath-Pileser III) in 1 Chronicles 5:26 are in harmony with Assyrian historical and archaeological materials. Cuneiform inscriptions, tribute lists, deportation records, and the robust chronology of the Neo-Assyrian Empire synchronize with the biblical narrative of northern Israel’s subjugation and exile. Thus, the biblical account aligns with the broader external witness from ancient Near Eastern texts, demonstrating a consistent timeline between Scripture’s description of these Assyrian activities and what verifiable records from Tiglath-Pileser III’s reign reveal. |
    |