Numbers 32:34–38: Can we verify the rapid construction or fortification of these cities in Transjordan through any historical or archaeological findings? I. Overview of Numbers 32:34–38 Numbers 32:34–38 describes how the tribes of Gad and Reuben established or fortified several cities in the Transjordan region following the Israelites’ victories east of the Jordan River. The passage reads: “Then the sons of Gad built up Dibon, Ataroth, Aroer, Atroth-shophan, Jazer, Jogbehah, Beth-nimrah, and Beth-haran as fortified cities, and they built folds for their flocks. The sons of Reuben built Heshbon, Elealeh, and Kiriathaim, as well as Nebo and Baal-meon (whose names were changed) and Sibmah. They renamed the cities they rebuilt.” Questions arise concerning whether these references to “building” or “fortifying” can be substantiated by archaeological or historical evidence, especially regarding the speed and feasibility of such construction. The following sections will detail insights from Scripture, archaeological surveys, and historical records that shed light on this topic. II. Historical Context and Timeframe 1. Biblical Chronology • According to a traditional biblical chronology (similar to Ussher’s), the events in Numbers 32 would have occurred in the late fifteenth century or early fourteenth century BC, during the latter stages of Israel’s wilderness journey. • The tribes of Gad and Reuben had abundant livestock (Numbers 32:1–5). They requested permission to settle east of the Jordan, and Moses allowed it, on condition that they help conquer the land west of the Jordan afterward (Numbers 32:20–22). 2. “Build” vs. “Rebuild” or “Fortify” • The Hebrew wording in Numbers 32 can indicate building anew or rebuilding and fortifying pre-existing settlements. Linguistically, “built” may reflect structural or defensive enhancements rather than entirely new foundations. • This perspective aligns with other biblical passages where “building” can mean restoring or augmenting ruins, ramparts, and defenses (e.g., 1 Kings 12:25, 2 Chronicles 11:5–6). III. Key Sites Mentioned 1. Dibon • Identified with modern Dhiban in Jordan. • The famous Mesha Stele (discovered in 1868) refers to Dibon as a significant Moabite center. Although the stele dates primarily to the ninth century BC, it attests to Dibon’s longstanding importance in the Transjordan region. • Excavations at Dhiban by various archaeological teams have revealed layers of occupation stretching back to the Iron Age, suggesting that an earlier settlement (or fortification) would have existed when the Gadites would have arrived, allowing for relatively quick repairs or additions. 2. Ataroth • The Mesha Stele also references Ataroth. • Archaeological surveys suggest the site contained a settlement during the Iron Age I (roughly 1200–1000 BC). While the specific details of Ataroth’s fortifications are still debated, the biblical narrative’s claim of occupation or refurbishment is plausible given the broader evidence of settlement activity. 3. Heshbon • Excavated at Tell Hesban by Andrews University and other teams starting in the 1960s. • Evidence reveals multiple occupational layers, including structures from the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages, aligning with a timeframe in which Reubenites could have taken control and fortified or rebuilt the city as per Numbers 32:37. • While some layers are only partially preserved, the findings point to continuous habitation, supporting the notion that biblical references to “building” these cities likely corresponded to enhancement or reoccupation rather than constructing from scratch. 4. Elealeh, Nebo, Baal-meon, Kiriathaim, Jazer • These places appear repeatedly in the Old Testament and in external references (e.g., Moabite inscriptions). • Excavations and surveys conducted in the Transjordan have revealed signs of small settlements and fortifications dating to the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age transitions, making a modest but swift refurbishment of these settlements or fortifications feasible. IV. Archaeological Indicators of Rapid Fortification 1. Reuse of Existing Structures • Across the Ancient Near East, it was common for incoming groups to strengthen existing walls, gates, and other defensive constructs, allowing for rapid military readiness without building entirely new cities. • At sites like Heshbon (Tell Hesban) and Dibon (Dhiban), evidence exists of layers where older walls were refitted, which illustrates how fortification efforts could have been completed in relatively short spans. 2. Local Building Materials • Stones and mudbricks were abundant in the Transjordan region. Because materials were readily available, construction often proceeded faster than modern assumptions might suggest. • Numerous Iron Age fortresses and watchtowers, visible in surveys across Jordan, testify to the efficiency of ancient building methods which required fewer transported resources and drew on communal labor. V. Comparative Ancient Records and Chronological Corroboration 1. Mesha Stele (c. 840 BC) • Although later than the events of Numbers 32, the Mesha Stele’s mention of cities like Dibon and Ataroth demonstrates that they were recognized fortresses or settlements. • This stele provides a window into the significance of these locations, confirming that such cities were strategic sites, thus worthy of fortification. 2. Egyptian and Assyrian Inscriptions • Some Egyptian topographical lists mention territories east of the Jordan, affirming activity there in what would be the biblical period. While direct references to Gadite fortifications are not found, these documents show Transjordan was continuously inhabited and under varying degrees of imperial or regional control. VI. Feasibility of Rapid Construction 1. Military Urgency • The tribes of Gad and Reuben had a vested interest in securing their livestock and ensuring defense against hostile neighbors, necessitating swift action (Numbers 32:24). • The cyclical threat of regional conflict in the Transjordan (documented in texts like Judges) supports the plausibility that defenses were promptly constructed or reinforced. 2. Communal Labor • Ancient building was often carried out by the collective efforts of tribes or families, accelerating the process. • Scriptural anecdotes (e.g., Nehemiah 3) show how enlisting the broader community to build or fortify walls could lead to rapid progress. VII. Conclusion Archaeological discoveries at sites such as Dhiban (ancient Dibon), Tell Hesban (ancient Heshbon), and other Transjordan settlements provide strong indications that the cities mentioned in Numbers 32:34–38 were well-established in antiquity. The biblical text’s reference to “building” or “fortifying” likely involved refurbishing existing walls and structures, a practice archaeologically attested throughout the region. Findings from the Mesha Stele and results of modern excavations confirm the historical reality of these locations, confirming their prominence and strategic importance. The addition or strengthening of fortifications could have been completed rapidly by ancient standards, particularly with an urgent need for defense, a tradition of reusing materials, and collective labor. Numbers 32:34–38 thus remains consistent with the historical and archaeological framework of the Late Bronze to Early Iron Age in Transjordan. While no single artifact explicitly states, “Gad and Reuben built these cities quickly,” a convergence of biblical, inscriptional, and archaeological data supports the credibility of the biblical account. |
    |