But although Hermogenes finds it amongst his own colourable pretences [6482] (for it was not in his power to discover it in the Scriptures of God), it is enough for us, both that it is certain that all things were made by God, and that there is no certainty whatever that they were made out of Matter. And even if Matter had previously existed, we must have believed that it had been really made by God, since we maintained (no less) when we held the rule of faith to be, [6483] that nothing except God was uncreated. [6484] Up to this point there is room for controversy, until Matter is brought to the test of the Scriptures, and fails to make good its case. [6485] The conclusion of the whole is this: I find that there was nothing made, except out of nothing; because that which I find was made, I know did not once exist. Whatever [6486] was made out of something, has its origin in something made: for instance, out of the ground was made the grass, and the fruit, and the cattle, and the form of man himself; so from the waters were produced the animals which swim and fly. The original fabrics [6487] out of which such creatures were produced I may call their materials, [6488] but then even these were created by God.

---

Footnotes:

[6482] Colores. See our "Anti-Marcion," p. 217, Edin., where the word pretension should stand instead of precedent.

[6483] Præscribentes.

[6484] Innatum: see above, note 12.

[6485] Donec ad Scripturas provocata deficiat exibitio materiæ.

[6486] Etiamsi quid.

[6487] Origines.

[6488] Materias. There is a point in this use of the plural of the controverted term materia.